Please confirm my Activity Coefficient Calculations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculations of the activity coefficient, specifically focusing on the correct computation of the ionic strength (I) and its implications for determining the activity coefficient (γ) in the context of solutions containing KNO3 and CaSO4. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical clarification of the formulas involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the correct formula for ionic strength (I) is I = 1/2∑cz2 for all ions present, challenging the use of √I in calculations.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the calculations, initially assuming that s (the concentration of simple ions) is equal to c, and later revising their approach to calculate I correctly.
  • A participant confirms the calculation of I as 0.0666M, suggesting that this value leads to an overall activity coefficient that aligns with experimental values.
  • There is a correction regarding the interpretation of the ionic strength formula, emphasizing the importance of using I rather than √I.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial calculations, but there is agreement on the correct interpretation of the ionic strength formula after some clarification. Disagreement exists regarding the initial assumptions and calculations made by one participant.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the units used in the calculations and the assumptions regarding the concentrations of the ions involved. The discussion reflects a dependency on the definitions of terms and the correct application of formulas.

Yokoko
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I've had a go at these but am unsure about the result. I thought the values would have to be closer to each other.
Relevant Equations
See picture
IMG_20201025_192654__01.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have not calculated I correctly. I (not √I) = 1/2∑cz2 for ALL ions present.
Then you haven't used your calculated value for I in the equation for logγ. You used c. Why?
(Do it correctly, and it does come out close to the experimental value.)
 
IMG_20201026_110941.jpg

Thanks for your answer. Again, I'm not sure if I understood this correctly.

I used c as I thought s = c for simple ions. I now took the root of √I to get I.

I assumed the C for KNO3 = 0.0050 and C for CaSO4 = s = 0.0154

This might be where I am wrong?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20201026_110647.jpg
    IMG_20201026_110647.jpg
    66.4 KB · Views: 217
No! 1/2Σcz2 is I, not √I, as I said before. (What are the units?) I = 0.0666M.
 
Oops thanks, I misread your earlier message.
With I = 0.0666 I get an overall value of 0.41 which fits.

Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

Chemistry Calculate the activity of the chloride ion in a solution
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Chemistry Calculating total activity from decay of this sample of technetium
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Chemistry What Does Delta Gn Represent in the MIT Chemistry Course Equation?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Chemistry Concentration of Phosphorus from KH2PHO4
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
How Do You Calculate the Activity Coefficient of H+ from pH?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Chemistry Understanding the calculation of enthalpy of the formation of benzene
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Chemistry Solving pH Changes: Adding Acid to a Buffer or Water
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Chemistry How do we use enthalpy of formation in this calculation?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Chemistry Thoughts on Introduction to Chemistry fourth Edition by Bauer?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Chemistry Calculate the boiling temperature of methanol from thermodynamic data
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K