Please help I need to prove a physics teacher wrong

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misconception that "an observer can see more of their image by moving further back from the mirror." Participants clarify that as one moves closer to a mirror, they see more of their surroundings, but their own image appears larger, limiting the view of the surroundings. The angles of incidence and reflection play a crucial role, as they decrease with distance from the mirror, maintaining the same visible area. The conversation emphasizes that the statement is indeed a misconception, particularly for non-flat objects like human faces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic optics principles, specifically angles of incidence and reflection.
  • Familiarity with the concept of perspective in visual perception.
  • Knowledge of how distance affects the size of reflected images.
  • Basic comprehension of the differences between flat and three-dimensional objects.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the laws of reflection and their implications in optics.
  • Explore the concept of perspective and how it affects visual perception.
  • Study the effects of distance on image size in mirrors and lenses.
  • Investigate common misconceptions in physics education and their origins.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators addressing common misconceptions, and anyone interested in the principles of optics and visual perception.

eromero7
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm not able to understand this misconception
"An observer can see more of their image by moving further back from the mirror"

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tested and I believe I can see more of the image as I move further back from the mirror, but I know it needs to be something with visuals, or with the angle that the object reflects but yet I'm not able to come up with a conclusion. Please help I'm a biology major and have never taken any physics courses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eromero7 said:

Homework Statement



I'm not able to understand this misconception
"An observer can see more of their image by moving further back from the mirror"

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tested and I believe I can see more of the image as I move further back from the mirror, but I know it needs to be something with visuals, or with the angle that the object reflects but yet I'm not able to come up with a conclusion. Please help I'm a biology major and have never taken any physics courses.

You can test this practically, or derive it theoretically, but either way the statement is incorrect, and indeed a common misconception.

As you move closer to a mirror, you can see more and more of the surroundings [the image of the surroundings reflected in the mirror] - but as you get closer, the image of yourself also gets bigger, so you don't see a greater expanse of that. By getting bigger I am referring to the "Sesame Street" idea/song , that things look bigger when they are closer up.
 
I'm not able to understand this misconception
"An observer can see more of their image by moving further back from the mirror"

This is one of those statements that is suposed to make you think about angle of incidence and angle of reflection, both of which in a mirror are equal. As you move farther from the mirror both angles decrease. If at the bottom of the mirror you can see your belly button, than farther away you will again see no farther down than your belly button. And that is why it is a misconception, and what them mean from a textbook point if view.

But that is only for people or objects that are flat.
As we know people are not flat, but have curves and protusions.
Look at your face in the mirror from say 3 feet away. Then move closer. as you move closer, you will notice that parts of your face begin to disappear from view. You cheeks may begin to hide your ears and sides of the face. Your chin may hide you neck, and since the top of your head is curved you will see less and less of that part.

So is the statement a misconception or not. It depends on the point of reference.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
902
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K