PN Junctions vs Transistors When Building Logic Gates

Click For Summary
Logic gates are primarily built using transistors rather than PN junctions due to the additional control and functionality that transistors provide. Transistors have three contacts, allowing them to act as more versatile switches compared to the two-contact PN junctions. While both components can function as switches, transistors can amplify signals and switch states more efficiently. The discussion highlights that transistors are essentially constructed from PN junctions, emphasizing their foundational role in logic gate design. Overall, the advantages of transistors in logic gate applications stem from their enhanced control and operational capabilities.
Vishera
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
Is there any reason why logic gates are built using transistors instead of PN junctions? Wouldn't it be more cost-efficient to use PN junctions? I am referring to CMOS logic gates.

Also, what can a transistor do that a PN junction can't?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
It seems to me that both PN junctions and transistors act as switches. And both switches are voltage-controlled. So what advantage does a transistor have over a PN junction? When the voltage is high on a PN junction, it is in forward bias and it allows current to pass though. When the voltage is low on a PN junction, it is in zero bias and it does not allow current to pass through. When a NPN bipolar transistor's base voltage is high, it allows current to pass through. When a NPN bipolar transistor's base voltage is low, it does not allow current to pass through.

EDIT: Actually, I think I get it now. A PN junction has only two contacts while a transistor has three contacts.
 
I'm glad you realized the problem: transistors are made out of PN junctions!
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K