PN Junctions vs Transistors When Building Logic Gates

Vishera
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
Is there any reason why logic gates are built using transistors instead of PN junctions? Wouldn't it be more cost-efficient to use PN junctions? I am referring to CMOS logic gates.

Also, what can a transistor do that a PN junction can't?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
It seems to me that both PN junctions and transistors act as switches. And both switches are voltage-controlled. So what advantage does a transistor have over a PN junction? When the voltage is high on a PN junction, it is in forward bias and it allows current to pass though. When the voltage is low on a PN junction, it is in zero bias and it does not allow current to pass through. When a NPN bipolar transistor's base voltage is high, it allows current to pass through. When a NPN bipolar transistor's base voltage is low, it does not allow current to pass through.

EDIT: Actually, I think I get it now. A PN junction has only two contacts while a transistor has three contacts.
 
I'm glad you realized the problem: transistors are made out of PN junctions!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top