Point Kinetics for Linear Insertion of Reactivity

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using point reactor kinetics equations to determine reactor power as a function of time when a reactivity term, gamma*t, is introduced to a reactor at equilibrium. The participants explore how long-lived transients affect the complexity of the roots in the inhour equation, suggesting that simplifications regarding the reactivity to beta ratio may not be applicable. Additionally, the implications of these long-lived transients on the overall solution are considered, highlighting the need for careful analysis. Key concepts such as the lifetime of prompt neutrons and the assumptions surrounding the inhour equation are also addressed. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate modeling of reactor behavior under varying conditions.
a1234
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
I want to use the point reactor kinetics equations to solve for the power as a function time when a reactivity of gamma*t is added to a reactor that is at equilibrium at time 0. I am also asked to consider the case where the transients are long-lived compared to the lifetime of prompt neutrons.

In solving for the reactor power, would the condition on the transients imply that the roots of the inhour equation would become more complicated (i.e. we cannot make the appropriate simplifications regarding the ratio of the reactivity to beta)? What other implications do the long-lived transients have in the solution?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
a1234 said:
I want to use the point reactor kinetics equations to solve for the power as a function time when a reactivity of gamma*t is added to a reactor that is at equilibrium at time 0. I am also asked to consider the case where the transients are long-lived compared to the lifetime of prompt neutrons.

In solving for the reactor power, would the condition on the transients imply that the roots of the inhour equation would become more complicated (i.e. we cannot make the appropriate simplifications regarding the ratio of the reactivity to beta)? What other implications do the long-lived transients have in the solution?
1. What text or reference is one using?

2. What does one mean by transient?

3. What is the lifetime of a prompt neutron?

4. Please write the point kinetics equations as you understand them.

5. What are the assumptions (and limitations) regarding the in-hour equation?

6. What does one mean by "we cannot make the appropriate simplifications regarding the ratio of the reactivity to beta"? The reactivity can be ρ < β, ρ = β, ρ < β; ρ < β is controlled, ρ > β essentially uncontrolled, and undesirable.
 
Thread 'Creating the geometry using MNCPX VisEd'
I'm working on the MSFR design and want to calculate keff. I'm trying to use the MNCPX VisEd program included with MCNP 6.1 to create my geometry. The reactor I'm designing doesn't contain fuel rods or moderator structures. The molten salt fuel circulates within the cylindrical reactor core. I'm having problems creating the geometry using MNCPX VisEd. VisEd allows for easy drawing of nested sphere, cylinder, or rectangular prism cells. However, when you want to draw a torus section within...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
496
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K