Poisson distribution involving 2 variables

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a coffee shop where the sales of coffee and tea are modeled as independent Poisson random variables. The mean sales for coffee is given as 1.5 cups per minute, and for tea, it is 0.5 cups per minute. The task is to calculate the probability of selling less than 5 cups of drinks in a 3-minute period, as well as the probability that all sold cups in a 1-minute period are coffee when exactly 3 cups are sold.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the independence of the two random variables and the implications for calculating probabilities. There are attempts to express the total sales as combinations of coffee and tea sold. Some participants question the notation used and the reasoning behind the calculations. Others suggest considering the distribution of the sum of independent Poisson variables.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on notation and the importance of commenting on work. There is recognition of different approaches to the problem, including the use of symbolic representation before substituting numbers. Some participants express uncertainty about specific calculations and the correctness of results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of clarity in calculations and the potential for errors when using shorthand notation. There is also mention of homework constraints that may affect how solutions are presented.

somecelxis
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A coffee shop sell tea and coffee. The number of cups of coffee sold in a minute can be assumed to be a random poisson variable with mean = 1.5 . The number of cups of tea sold can be assumed to be an independent random variable with mean = 0.5.
Calculate the probability that in a period of 3minutes , less than 5 cups of drink were sold.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


less than 5 cups drink sold= 4 cup + 3 cup + 2 cup +1 cup + 0 cup, ( I let coffee = X , tea = Y) ,
so i have ( 3X , 1Y ) + ( 3Y , 1X ) +( 2X , 1Y) +( 2Y , 1X) + ( 1X , 1Y) +(2X , 0Y) + (2Y , 0X) + (1X) + (1Y) = 0.877 , please refer to the photo below for the working.

sorry , since this involve complicated maths formula , so i can't type it one by one and post it here . i attached the working in the photo .
 

Attachments

  • imid.JPG
    imid.JPG
    66.2 KB · Views: 560
Physics news on Phys.org
Care with your notation 3X is "3 multiplied into X".
P(x,y):=P(X=x,Y=y) would be the probability of x coffees and y teas being sold in the same 3min interval.
By (3X,1Y) I assume you mean 3 coffees and 1 tea, or (x,y)=(3,1).

I cannot see your reasoning from the sheet of calculations you attached.
Are tea and coffee sales independent?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
The problem says "The number of cups of tea sold can be assumed to be an independent random variable". That doesn't say "independent" of what but since "number of cups of coffee sold" is the only other random variable, yes, I believe it is saying that tea and coffee sales are independent. (Which, in real situation, I would not consider likely.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
You *can* do it like that (assuming independent sales). However, splitting it up in all cases is not a priori required. What is the distribution of the sum of two independent Poisson distributions?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
Care with your notation 3X is "3 multiplied into X".
P(x,y):=P(X=x,Y=y) would be the probability of x coffees and y teas being sold in the same 3min interval.
By (3X,1Y) I assume you mean 3 coffees and 1 tea, or (x,y)=(3,1).

I cannot see your reasoning from the sheet of calculations you attached.
Are tea and coffee sales independent?

yes , both are independent. can you tell me why i am wrong?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
Are you wrong? It is hard to tell because you have not commented your work.
It certainly looks sub-optimal.

There are two main approaches - either work through each possible combination (which works faster in table form) or by combining the two distributions.
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Independent_Poisson_Random_Variables_is_Poisson

by introducing new variable , i ahve the new mean = 3(1.5+0.50 = 6 , then i plug in the mean into the poisson formua , then i got the ans eventually..
 
Simon Bridge said:
Are you wrong? It is hard to tell because you have not commented your work.
It certainly looks sub-optimal.

There are two main approaches - either work through each possible combination (which works faster in table form) or by combining the two distributions.
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sum_of_Independent_Poisson_Random_Variables_is_Poisson

here's another part of the question .
In a period of a minutes , exactly 3 cups of drink were sold. Find the probality of that 3 cups sold were coffee ,
i let X = coffee Y= tea
I have attached the working in the photo.
my working is P(3 cups coffee n 0 cup tea ) / P( 3 drinks ) = 0.42

in the photo , for P( 3 drinks ), i have inserted the value of X and Y and calcultaed outside, the ans is 0.180 the formula for the coffee and tea is shown in the photo. p/s : probability of 3 drinks = P(3X , 0Y) + P(2X , 1Y) +P(1X, 2Y ) + P(3 Y , 0X)= 0.180 P(3 cups coffee n 0 cup tea )= 0.07612. then i take P(3 cups coffee n 0 cup tea ) / P( 3 drinks ) = 0.42 , But the ans is 0.442.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140817_222510[1].jpg
    IMG_20140817_222510[1].jpg
    31.7 KB · Views: 478
somecelxis said:
by introducing new variable , i ahve the new mean = 3(1.5+0.50 = 6 , then i plug in the mean into the poisson formua , then i got the ans eventually..

Are you saying that for independent Poisson random variables X and Y the total, X+Y, is also a Poisson random variable? That, of course, is a very well-known result and is found in every probability textbook.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
somecelxis said:
here's another part of the question .
In a period of a minutes , exactly 3 cups of drink were sold. Find the probality of that 3 cups sold were coffee ,
Please be careful of your notation and comment your work so I can see your reasoning.

It is not good enough to get the answer - even the correct answer is not good enough - you must also be able to show someone else how you got the answer so that they can easily follow your working.
 
  • #11
somecelxis said:
here's another part of the question .
In a period of a minutes , exactly 3 cups of drink were sold. Find the probality of that 3 cups sold were coffee ,
i let X = coffee Y= tea
I have attached the working in the photo.
my working is P(3 cups coffee n 0 cup tea ) / P( 3 drinks ) = 0.42

in the photo , for P( 3 drinks ), i have inserted the value of X and Y and calcultaed outside, the ans is 0.180 the formula for the coffee and tea is shown in the photo. p/s : probability of 3 drinks = P(3X , 0Y) + P(2X , 1Y) +P(1X, 2Y ) + P(3 Y , 0X)= 0.180 P(3 cups coffee n 0 cup tea )= 0.07612


. then i take P(3 cups coffee n 0 cup tea ) / P( 3 drinks ) = 0.42 , But the ans is 0.442.

The correct answer is (3/4)^3 = 27/64 = 0.421875, so your answer is OK.

BTW: The distribution of P(C=k|C+T=n) (C = coffee sales, T = tea sales) is very well known; see almost any textbook and several web pages found from searching on keywords 'poisson distribution'. You will gain a lot more insight if you first evaluate it symbolically and then plug in numbers at the end! This also makes the computations a lot easier.

Finally: please try to respect PF standards, and post typed versions of your work whenever possible. Your submitted photo is almost useless: it is uncommented, messy and does not show enough intermediate steps. Try to reserve thumbnails for things like drawings and diagrams, etc. Usually I do not look at such thumbnails, and often I cannot even read them at all on some media.
 
  • #12
by introducing new variable = number of cups of coffee and tea sold which is equivalent to sales of coffee + sales of tea. to find the In a period of a minutes , exactly 3 cups of drink were sold. Find the probality of that 3 cups sold were coffee
i have P(W=3) = ((e^-6)(6^3) )/3! = 0.0892 , then i take 0.07612 divided by 0.0892 , ans = 0.85 , why can't i do in this way?
 
  • #13
somecelxis said:
by introducing new variable = number of cups of coffee and tea sold which is equivalent to sales of coffee + sales of tea. to find the In a period of a minutes , exactly 3 cups of drink were sold. Find the probality of that 3 cups sold were coffee
i have P(W=3) = ((e^-6)(6^3) )/3! = 0.0892 , then i take 0.07612 divided by 0.0892 , ans = 0.85 , why can't i do in this way?


Where does the 0.07612 come from? It looks wrong.
 
  • #14
Ray Vickson said:
Where does the 0.07612 come from? It looks wrong.

( (e^-1.5)(1.5^3)/ 3! ) x ( (e^-0.5)(0.5^0) / 0!) =0.07612
 
  • #15
somecelxis said:
( (e^-1.5)(1.5^3)/ 3! ) x ( (e^-0.5)(0.5^0) / 0!) =0.07612

Should be
[tex]P(C = 3,T = 0) = \frac{e^{-c}c^3}{3!} \cdot e^{-t}[/tex]
where ##c = 3 \times 1.5 = 4.5, t = 3 \times 0.5 = 1.5##.

That, by the way, is one very good reason for the advice I gave you before (first write things out symbolically, then substitute numbers afterwards). It really does help to avoid blunders, as well as helping to make the work readable.

Edit: sorry. I see the time period is now 1 minute, not three, so your numerator was correct. Your denominator was wrong, however: it should be
[tex]P(C+T=3) = \frac{e^{-2} 2^3}{3!}[/tex]
because C and T are now independent Poisson random variables with means 1.5 and 0.5.

The answer is still ##(3/4)^3 = 27/64##. This answer would be the same if we asked for the probability of 3 coffees given 3 drinks in 1 year, one microsecond, 1 hour, or any time period! You will see that if you write things out symbolically!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K