Polar coordinates of the centroid of a uniform sector

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the centroid of a uniform sector using both Cartesian and polar coordinates. The Cartesian coordinates yield results for the centroid's x and y components as ##\bar{x}=\frac{2a\sin\theta}{3\theta}## and ##\bar{y}=\frac{2a(1-\cos\theta)}{3\theta}##, while polar coordinates provide ##\bar{r}=\frac{2a}{3}## and ##\bar{\theta}=\frac{\theta}{2}##. The key error identified is treating r as a scalar rather than a vector, which affects the calculation of the centroid's position. The correct approach involves expressing the polar basis vectors in Cartesian terms to accurately compute the centroid's coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centroid calculations in geometry
  • Familiarity with Cartesian and polar coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of vector representation in polar coordinates
  • Basic integration techniques in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector calculus to understand the representation of vectors in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the application of polar coordinates in calculating areas and centroids
  • Explore advanced integration techniques for calculating centroids in complex shapes
  • Investigate the implications of coordinate transformations on geometric properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers involved in geometric analysis, particularly those focusing on centroid calculations and coordinate transformations.

parsesnip
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find the centre of mass of a uniform sector of radius a and angle θ.
Relevant Equations
##A=\frac{1}{2}a^2\theta##
Average value of value of ##f## over ##A=\frac{1}{A}\iint f\, dA##
If I use cartesian co-ordinates, I get:
##\bar{x}=\frac{1}{A}\iint x\, dA=\frac{1}{A} \iint r^2\cos\theta\, dr\, d\theta= \frac{2a\sin\theta}{3\theta}##
##\bar{y}=\frac{1}{A}\iint y\, dA=\frac{1}{A}\iint r^2\sin\theta\, dr\, d\theta= \frac{2a(1-\cos\theta)}{3\theta}##

But if I use polar co-ordinates, I get:
##\bar{r}=\frac{1}{A}\iint r\,dA=\frac{1}{A}\iint r^2\, dr\, d\theta=\frac{2a}{3}##
##\bar{\theta}=\frac{1}{A}\iint \theta\,dA=\frac{1}{A}\iint r\theta\, dr\, d\theta=\frac{\theta}{2}##

I believe the cartesian co-ordinates are correct and obviously the value of ##\bar{\theta}## is correct, but the polar co-ordinates of the centroid do not correspond with the cartesian co-ordinates. What is wrong with my calculation of ##\bar{r}##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Centroids in non-cartesian coordinates don't work that way.

We are looking for \bar{\mathbf{r}} = \frac{\int_A \mathbf{r}\,dA }{\int_A\,dA}. Now in cartesian coordinates you can do that by components easily: \mathbf{r} = x\mathbf{e}_x + y\mathbf{e}_y and the basis vectors are constant, so <br /> \bar{\mathbf{r}} = \frac{\int_A x\,dA \mathbf{e}_x + \int_A y\,dA \mathbf{e}_y}{\int_A\,dA}.
But in plane polars we have \mathbf{r} = r\mathbf{e}_r(\theta), and in this case <br /> \bar{\mathbf{r}} = \frac{2}{a^2 \Theta} \int_0^a r^2\,dr \int_0^{\Theta} \mathbf{e}_r(\theta)\,d\theta. To integrate \mathbf{e}_r(\theta) you must first express it in terms of the constant cartesian basis: <br /> \mathbf{e}_r(\theta) = \cos \theta\,\mathbf{e}_x + \sin\theta\,\mathbf{e}_y<br /> Once you have done that, you can find the polar coordinates of the centroid from <br /> \bar{r}^2 = \bar{x}^2 + \bar{y}^2 \qquad \tan{\bar\theta} = \frac{\bar y }{\bar x}.

I agree with your results for \bar x and \bar y, but as you've discovered <br /> \bar x \neq \frac{2a}{3} \cos (\Theta/2)\quad\mbox{and}\quad<br /> \bar y \neq \frac{2a}{3} \sin(\Theta/2).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parsesnip
As it happens, <br /> \frac{\bar y}{\bar x} = \frac{1 - \cos \Theta}{\sin\Theta} = \frac{2 \sin^2 (\frac12\Theta)}{2\sin(\frac12\Theta)\cos(\frac12\Theta)} = \tan(\tfrac12\Theta) but this is purely a coincidence.
 
Thank you so much for your answer! So I gather that my error was thinking of r as a scalar instead of a vector.

So does that mean that ##\frac{\iint r^2\,dr\,d\theta}{\iint_A dA}## is the average distance of a point in the sector from the origin, but the average displacement of a point in the sector from the origin (which is the displacement of the centrodi) is given by ##\frac{\iint r^{2}(\cos\theta \hat{i} + \sin\theta \hat {j})\,dr\,d\theta}{\iint_A dA}##?
 
parsesnip said:
Thank you so much for your answer! So I gather that my error was thinking of r as a scalar instead of a vector.

So does that mean that ##\frac{\iint r^2\,dr\,d\theta}{\iint_A dA}## is the average distance of a point in the sector from the origin, but the average displacement of a point in the sector from the origin (which is the displacement of the centrodi) is given by ##\frac{\iint r^{2}(\cos\theta \hat{i} + \sin\theta \hat {j})\,dr\,d\theta}{\iint_A dA}##?
Yes.
 
pasmith said:
but this is purely a coincidence.
Not sure what you mean by that. Isn't it evident that the centroid will lie on the angle bisector?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K