Polarization and refractive index

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between refractive index and polarization, particularly in the context of birefringent materials. Participants explore the definitions, implications, and phenomena associated with birefringence, Brewster's angle, and the behavior of light at interfaces between different materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that there is a relationship between refractive index and polarization, particularly in birefringent materials.
  • Others seek clarification on what constitutes a birefringent material, with references to definitions and properties from external sources.
  • One participant explains that the speed of light in a medium is affected by the polarization of light due to interactions with the material's molecules.
  • There are discussions about Brewster's angle, with some participants noting that it varies in birefringent substances due to their polarization-dependent refractive indices.
  • Questions arise regarding the nature of Brewster's angle in birefringent materials, including whether there can be multiple Brewster angles based on the orientation of the incident light.
  • Participants reference the Fresnel equations and their implications for reflection and transmission at interfaces, particularly in anisotropic materials.
  • Some express difficulty in accessing relevant literature and resources, highlighting issues with subscription access and library resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that birefringence affects the relationship between refractive index and polarization, but there are multiple competing views regarding the specifics of Brewster's angle and the implications of birefringence in different contexts. The discussion remains unresolved on several technical points.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the clarity of definitions and the complexity of the mathematical relationships involved. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of birefringence and Brewster's angle, and there are unresolved questions about the behavior of light at interfaces.

fissionary
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is there any relation between refractive index and polarization?
 
Science news on Phys.org
If the medium is birefringent, yes.
 
Could you tell me what is a birefringent material?
 
shiromani said:
Could you tell me what is a birefringent material?
Have you tried the wikipedia article?
"Birefringence is the optical property of a material having a refractive index that depends on the polarization and propagation direction of light."
 
Vagn said:
Have you tried the wikipedia article?
I did read the wikipedia article, but didn't understand why the materials refractive index depends on polarization.Please explain me. Thank you.
 
The speed of light in a medium is less than c because of the interaction of the light with the molecules. They become polarised (charge displacements) by the oscillating fields and this imposes a 'drag' on the wave going through. Mostly, more dense materials will slow the light down more (lead glass has a higher refractive index than cheap glass). Some crystals, because of the asymmetry of the charges and the atomic forces, will drag more for one polarisation of wave than another so this makes the speeds different. Iceland Spar (Calcite) has a very strong polarising effect. The Wiki article explains this; try it again.
 
Well, the Brewster angles are different in birefringent substances - because the refractive index depends upon polarisation.
 
Different in respect to what? I thought that the definition is the same as in isotropic media: the angle at which one polarization component is not reflected.
 
  • #10
I only have a smart phone at the mo and find it difficult to read and write a lot. But I think the effect at the surface of a birefringence material is that the reflected ray will have elliptical polarisation due to the relative angles betwee the crystal lattice and the plane of the reflection.
Maybe someone could put us right on that one.
 
  • #11
It may be, sure.
The Brewster angle will have a range of values, depending of the orientation of the normal to the optic axis of the crystal.
Maybe this is what you mean by "Brewster angles are different"? But for each orientation the reflection coefficient for one polarization become zero at the Brewster angle for that orientation. I think that this does not change.
 
  • #12
1) Polarisation at an interface.
In general the transmission and reflection at the interface between materials with different refractive index is polarisation dependent. This is true even if both materials are isotropic or cubic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations
2) Birefringence.
In lower than cubic symmetry the propagation depends on the polarisation, so that a ray of arbitrary polarisation will be split into two rays with different propagation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence
3) Not properly birefringence
The refractive index depends on the direction of propagation even in the cubic case. This effect becomes noticeable at frequencies approaching the excitonic resonance of the crystal. It is often lumped with true birefringence for lack of a specific term.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
nasu said:
It may be, sure.
The Brewster angle will have a range of values, depending of the orientation of the normal to the optic axis of the crystal.
Maybe this is what you mean by "Brewster angles are different"? But for each orientation the reflection coefficient for one polarization become zero at the Brewster angle for that orientation. I think that this does not change.
I am suggesting that there will not necessarily be an angle at which the horizontal vector is ever zero for a birefringent substance. This would be because there are two Brewster angles involved potentially (depending on the actual direction of arrival of the incident ray..
 
  • #15
Andy Resnick said:
The Fresnel equations for isotropic-anisotropic, anisotropic-isotropic, etc. interfaces are given here:
Would it be possible for you to translate that article into a few words - just relating to the question? I tried to stagger through it but failed to pick up the important arm waving bit that I needed i.e. to say whether or not the brewster angle would be different for different arrival azimuths? I think that is implied but can't be sure.
 
  • #18
Thanks for the other link, nasu. It's kind of bizarre: there's no discussion either in Born and Wolf or the Handbook of Optics (although there's a claim in vol. 4, 2.19 that the equations are present 'elsewhere in this Handbook'), even though there are detailed models of birefringent devices that use reflection: Nicol prisms, etc.
 
  • #19
It may be. Depends what subscription deal your institution have.
Andy Resnick said:
Thanks for the other link, nasu. It's kind of bizarre: there's no discussion either in Born and Wolf or the Handbook of Optics (although there's a claim in vol. 4, 2.19 that the equations are present 'elsewhere in this Handbook'), even though there are detailed models of birefringent devices that use reflection: Nicol prisms, etc.
You are welcome.
There is a follow up too, I believe, by the same author.
 
  • #20
sophiecentaur said:
It looks like you have to pay to see that.(?)
It may be. You tried through your library?
 
  • #21
nasu said:
It may be. You tried through your library?
I don't have a college library. I can read books in my local Uni library but they do not let members of the public get on line resources. This situation is not uncommon for older PF members.
 
  • #22
sophiecentaur said:
I don't have a college library. I can read books in my local Uni library but they do not let members of the public get on line resources. This situation is not uncommon for older PF members.
It seems that I cannot email you. Is this the case?
 
  • #23
nasu said:
It seems that I cannot email you. Is this the case?
That''s right. I stopped doing PMs on forums some while ago. Sorry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
440
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K