Police car's acceleration physics problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for a police car, initially traveling at 95 km/h (converted to 26.389 m/s), to overtake a speeder traveling at 140 km/h (converted to 38.889 m/s) after a 1-second delay in acceleration. The correct formula to use is x_p = v_p t + 1/2 a(t-1)^2 for the police car and x_s = v_s t for the speeder. After correcting the equations and calculations, the time for the police car to overtake the speeder is approximately 14.4 seconds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic kinematics equations
  • Ability to convert units between km/h and m/s
  • Familiarity with acceleration concepts in physics
  • Knowledge of solving quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the kinematic equations for uniformly accelerated motion
  • Learn how to convert between different units of speed
  • Practice solving problems involving relative motion
  • Explore the implications of acceleration on pursuit scenarios in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of motion and acceleration concepts.

physicsss
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
A police car traveling a constant 95 km/h is passed by a speeder traveling 140 km/h. Precisely 1.00 s after the speeder passes, the policeman steps on the accelerator. If the police car's acceleration is 2.00 m/s2, how much time passes after the speeder passes before the police car overtakes the speeder (assumed moving at constant speed)?

I converted 95 km/h to 40 m/s, and 95 to 26 m/s, then I use the equation

x = x + v*t + 1/2 * a *t^2
40 m/s * t + 40 m = 0 + 26 m/s * t +1/2*2.0*t^2

t=15, but that's wrong...any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
95t+\frac{1}{2}at^2=140(t+1)

... where a is the acceleration with appropriate units, of course! :-)
 
I still get t=15 with that equation. :confused:
 
You did? I got 6.3 minutes if I did my arithmetic right - seems too long though! Check to see if you converted the units on your acceleration correctly.
 
well, since the final answer is in seconds, I converted 140 km/h and 95km/h to m/s. So

95km/h * 1h/60min * 1min/60s * 1000m/1km= 26.389 m/s and
140km/h * 1h/60min * 1min/60s * 1000m/1km= 38.889 m/s.

so 26.389*t+1/2*2.0*t^2=38.889(t+1)
and t=15 s.


:bugeye:
 
Oh! The t+1 in my original equation was incorrect. I was mixing seconds with hours. When I correct for that I get something closer to what you have (15.9s).

How do you know your answer is wrong?
 
The homework is online and when I entered 15s and submitted, it said it was incorrect.
 
You are getting distance, not acceleration, from that formula. The original formula Tide gave is correct. You need only solve for time. Keep trying.
 
Last edited:
Chronos, can you clarify what you said?
 
  • #10
Tide said:
95t+\frac{1}{2}at^2=140(t+1)
This isn't quite right for several reasons.

Measuring everything from the moment the speeder passes the police car (at t = 0):
Distance police car travels: x_p = v_p t + \frac{1}{2}a(t-1)^2, note that acceleration only begins at t = 1 second, v_p is the initial speed of the police car in m/s.
Distance speeder travels: x_s = v_s t, v_s is the speed of the speeder in m/s.

So, when the police car overtakes the speeder:
v_p t + \frac{1}{2}a(t-1)^2 = v_s t
All times measured in seconds. Now plug in your values and solve for t.
 
  • #11
Thanks, Al, I stand corrected!
 
  • #12
I got 14.4 seconds, is that correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K