Polynomial problem for homework

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a polynomial function defined as \(\mathbf{p(x) = 2009-2008x^{100}+2007x^{99}-2006x^{98}+.....+1909x}\) at the point \(x = 2008\). Participants explore different methods for calculating this value, including algebraic and computational approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants inquire whether to solve the problem exactly using algebra or approximately with a computer program. There are mentions of using summation notation and discussions about the correctness of methods presented. Some participants express concerns about providing direct answers versus guiding the original poster.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of methods to approach the problem, with some participants offering guidance on how to structure the solution. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed, but there is no explicit consensus on a single method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the potential for the polynomial to yield a very large number when evaluated, and there are mentions of verifying results using computational tools like Maxima. Additionally, there is a concern about adhering to forum rules regarding assistance and the original poster's effort.

juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
If [tex]\mathbf{p(x) = 2009-2008x^{100}+2007x^{99}-2006x^{98}+.....+1909x}[/tex]
Then Calculate [tex]\mathbf{p(2008)}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org


juantheron said:
If [tex]\mathbf{p(x) = 2009-2008x^{100}+2007x^{99}-2006x^{98}+.....+1909x}[/tex]
Then Calculate [tex]\mathbf{p(2008)}[/tex]

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Are you trying to do it exactly via algebra/arithmetic, or approximately with a computer program?

You can do this out in a straightforward way exactly if you use the summation (Sigma) notation. I've attached a scan of a sketched out way to approach the solution. Note that I did this very quickly and so I expect some mistakes there. However, you should be able to pick up on the method.
 

Attachments



stevenb said:
Are you trying to do it exactly via algebra/arithmetic, or approximately with a computer program?

You can do this out in a straightforward way exactly if you use the summation (Sigma) notation. I've attached a scan of a sketched out way to approach the solution. Note that I did this very quickly and so I expect some mistakes there. However, you should be able to pick up on the method.

thanks stevenb
 


juantheron said:
thanks stevenb

You are welcome.

I hate to leave an answer that I know is wrong, even if my intent was to give the method more than the correct answer. Tonight I was bored, so thought I would take the time to work this out correctly, just for the record, in case anyone comes across this thread in the future.

I attached the correct way to work it out exactly. I know this is correct because I took step #1 and step #10 and fed them into Maxima to make sure they agree. Of course, the answer is hundreds of digits long once expanded out, but both answers agree to the last digit.

Note that one could work out a general formula in terms of x rather that the one value of x=2008, by following the exact same procedure.
 

Attachments

Last edited:


stevenb said:
Note that one could work out a general formula in terms of x rather that the one value of x=2008, by following the exact same procedure.

And, making certain this horse has truly been beaten to death, I might as well post that too, since I worked it out in another fit of boredom. I should have done it that way the first time.

This works out to the following, which was verified with Maxima which expands it back to the original formula 2009-2008x^100+2007x^99 ... 1909x

[tex]{{2009+5927x+3917x^2-2009x^{101}-2008x^{102}}\over{(x+1)^2}}[/tex]
 
Last edited:


stevenb said:
You are welcome.

I hate to leave an answer that I know is wrong, even if my intent was to give the method more than the correct answer. Tonight I was bored, so thought I would take the time to work this out correctly, just for the record, in case anyone comes across this thread in the future.

I attached the correct way to work it out exactly. I know this is correct because I took step #1 and step #10 and fed them into Maxima to make sure they agree. Of course, the answer is hundreds of digits long once expanded out, but both answers agree to the last digit.

Note that one could work out a general formula in terms of x rather that the one value of x=2008, by following the exact same procedure.

Just as a matter of interest: how do you post an attachment to this forum? I see no tabs or buttons or menu items that look like "attach" commands.

RGV
 


stevenb said:
Are you trying to do it exactly via algebra/arithmetic, or approximately with a computer program?

You can do this out in a straightforward way exactly if you use the summation (Sigma) notation. I've attached a scan of a sketched out way to approach the solution. Note that I did this very quickly and so I expect some mistakes there. However, you should be able to pick up on the method.

Please do not do the student's work for them. That is against the rules. Especially when the student showed no effort at all in working out the problem.
 


Ray Vickson said:
Just as a matter of interest: how do you post an attachment to this forum? I see no tabs or buttons or menu items that look like "attach" commands.

RGV

When you are in the Advanced Reply (or New Topic) window, look next to the little smiley face pulldown menu for the paper clip "Attachments" pulldown menu. Clicking on that should get you to the Attachments dialog box.


EDIT -- since this thread is now locked, PM me if you have further questions about attachments.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K