Popular Physics: Undergraduate & PhD Research

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsHigh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the popularity of various branches of physics among undergraduate and PhD students, specifically focusing on condensed matter physics, astrophysics, cosmology, and particle physics. Participants explore job opportunities and personal interests in these fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that condensed matter physics is the largest subfield and offers more job opportunities compared to astrophysics, cosmology, and particle physics.
  • Others argue that the popularity of astrophysics and cosmology is driven by public interest, despite fewer job opportunities in those areas.
  • One participant mentions that job opportunities in condensed matter physics include roles in chemical companies, nanotechnology research, and electronics companies.
  • There is a suggestion that the competitiveness of a field may not directly correlate with its size, as larger fields may have more jobs but also more competition.
  • Some participants express a preference for practical applications in their research, indicating that they chose condensed matter physics over cosmology due to industry prospects.
  • Discussion includes insights into the nature of work in cosmology, emphasizing data analysis and established physics rather than speculative theories.
  • A participant shares their interest in astroparticle physics, indicating flexibility in their career path towards condensed matter physics if necessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the popularity and job prospects of various physics fields, with no consensus reached on which branch is definitively more popular or advantageous.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal experiences and opinions, which may not represent broader trends or data. The discussion includes hypothetical scenarios regarding career paths and educational stages.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a career in physics, particularly those interested in the comparative aspects of different physics branches and their job prospects.

PhysicsHigh
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Hi I was wondering what is the most popular branch of physics? During undergraduate studies what branch do students try do their research in and for their phd what branch or subject do most do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Condensed matter is the largest subfield.
 
How come? I would think everyone would want to do astrophysics or cosmology or string theory, or particle physics.
 
The job opportunities in those research field are far fewer than Condensed Matter Physics.
 
oh thanks
 
Oh also what kind of jobs?
 
Chemical companies, nano technology research, electronics companies, universities, nano-fabrication facilities, it depends on what you specialize in.
 
You asked what it is - now you seem to be arguing that their interests should be the same as your interests.
 
Kevin_Axion said:
The job opportunities in those research field are far fewer than Condensed Matter Physics.

I don't think that necessary follows. There will always be more jobs in big fields than small ones. That's the definition of "big".
 
  • #10
Wait, does that mean it is also the most competitive?
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
You asked what it is - now you seem to be arguing that their interests should be the same as your interests.

You don't need to be offended. I was just asking because I know a lot of people who are more interested in those fields mostly space stuff.
 
  • #12
PhysicsHigh said:
You don't need to be offended. I was just asking because I know a lot of people who are more interested in those fields mostly space stuff.

Interested in a 'popular science' kind of way, I imagine, rather than an 'actual science' way. When you find out what the work actually involves you might change your mind too. I considered cosmology as I find it fascinating, but the reason I didn't pursue it was that I wanted to do something with a focus on practical applications in the real world. I considered that I might want a position in industry some day, and cosmology isn't there in an industrial setting.
 
  • #13
Kevin_Axion said:
The job opportunities in those research field are far fewer than Condensed Matter Physics.

Also funding for graduate students is higher.

The other thing is that astrophysics, cosmology, and particle physics are *very* different from the way that it is portrayed in the popular media. For example, string theory is totally useless for any sort of cosmology and pretty close to useless for most types of particle physics.
 
  • #14
PhysicsHigh said:
How come? I would think everyone would want to do astrophysics or cosmology or string theory, or particle physics.

Condensed matter is *way* cool :cool:
 
  • #15
fasterthanjoao said:
Interested in a 'popular science' kind of way, I imagine, rather than an 'actual science' way. When you find out what the work actually involves you might change your mind too. I considered cosmology as I find it fascinating, but the reason I didn't pursue it was that I wanted to do something with a focus on practical applications in the real world. I considered that I might want a position in industry some day, and cosmology isn't there in an industrial setting.

How do cosmologists work
 
  • #16
PhysicsHigh said:
How do cosmologists work

Look at telescopes, run computer simulations, try to figure out how all the pieces of the universe fit together. Get your fingers messy with data. Lots of data.

I think Hawking is a brilliant scientist and anything that helps popularize science can't be all bad but...

1) most of the work in cosmology isn't about the what happens at time=zero. Very little of it is, because we just don't know that much about the physics of time zero. Most of the work in cosmology involves rather well established bits of physics, and people try to minimize the weird physics as much as possible.

2) it's all very data driven, which means that you spend a huge amount of time just reducing data. This means that the areas of cosmology that you see a lot of progress aren't the t=0 areas but the t=1 million years which we can actually see. There's also a lot of statistics in cosmology.
 
  • #17
I'd imagine astroparticle physics to be the same. I enjoy particle physics and astrophysics so I've decided on astroparticle physics. If things don't turn out this way then I can go into Condensed Matter Physics, there isn't any particular field I hate, I just find some more interesting than others.
 
  • #18
PhysicsHigh said:
You don't need to be offended. I was just asking because I know a lot of people who are more interested in those fields mostly space stuff.

Maybe you should also mention what level of education you are currently pursuing (high school/undergraduate). It is however true that space physics and particle physics related areas are usually the ones which attract high school students towards physics (IMO though :smile:).
 
  • #19
@Kevin_Axion: At what stage are you currently in your career? How exactly can you switch your field into consensed matter if things don't work out in Astroparticles?
 
  • #20
It's a hypothetical situation, but I've decided that I want to get into Condensed Matter Physics, it's just logical economically and greatly rewarding. I'm in Grade 11, I wasn't implying that I study Physics rather that I wish to.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K