Position of third charged particle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two charged particles, A and B, with charges +Q and +3Q, respectively, separated by a distance d. The objective is to determine the position of a third charged particle along the line connecting A and B such that it experiences no net electrostatic force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up an equation based on the forces acting on the third particle, with one participant attempting to solve for the position using the quadratic formula. Others express confusion regarding the expected answer and question the definitions and assumptions made in the problem statement.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing discussion regarding the validity of the calculations and the interpretation of the problem. Some participants express agreement on the calculated position, while others suggest there may be errors in the original poster's approach and highlight potential issues with the problem's wording.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the variable d is not clearly defined in the problem statement, raising questions about its implications for the solution. There is also mention of possible typos or errors in the original problem setup.

Voidy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two particles are separated by a distance d, Particle A has charge +Q and Particle B has charge +3Q. At what distance from particle A along the line connecting particles A and B would you place a third charged particle such that no net electrostatic force acts on it ?

Homework Equations


F = kq1q2 / r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Since there is no net electrostatic force on the third particle, the force from Particle A to C, and force from Particle B to C must be equal.

So I set up the equation
k(Q) / x^2 = k(3Q) / (d-x)^2

and solved for x using the quadratic formula.

I got

x = .366d

However, the answer is d/9, which is x = .111d

Can anyone help me ? Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get the same answer as you. The value can't be a rational fraction of the separation distance.

Note that they don't define d in the statement of the problem, yet they state their answer in terms of d. That's a clue right there that there's something amiss. Perhaps a typo!
 
Mister T said:
Note that they don't define d in the statement of the problem, yet they state their answer in terms of d. That's a clue right there that there's something amiss. Perhaps a typo!
I also agree with .366, but d is given.

The author seems to have made two errors:
Taken distance as inversely proportional to square of force, instead of the other way around;
Taken the ratio of the two distances instead of the ratio of the shorter distance to the total distance.
Very sloppy.
 
haruspex said:
I also agree with .366, but d is given.

Oh, yeah, so it is. How'd I miss that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K