Position Vectors in Physics: r=(x,y,z) to r=xi+yj+zk

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of position vectors in physics, specifically transitioning from the coordinate format r=(x,y,z) to the vector notation r=xi+yj+zk. This shift is essential for higher-level physics, such as Lagrangian mechanics, where basis vectors (i, j, k) are introduced to clarify directional components. The use of Cartesian coordinates is emphasized as the preferred basis for Newtonian mechanics, as equations of motion become independent of the basis when expressed in this form. The conversation highlights the necessity of basis vectors in various coordinate systems, reinforcing their role in accurately describing physical phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation in physics
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates
  • Basic knowledge of Newtonian mechanics
  • Introduction to Lagrangian mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of basis vectors in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Explore the differences between Cartesian and non-Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Learn about the equations of motion in various coordinate systems
  • Investigate the implications of using basis vectors in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals interested in the mathematical foundations of mechanics and the application of vector notation in both Newtonian and Lagrangian frameworks.

Bim
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
For describing position of a particle we need vector coordinates r=(x,y,z). But when you go to higher physics like lagrangian formalism also basis vectors are introduced. The position vector then becomes r=xi+yj+zk, where i,j,k are basis vectors. Why do we have do do that? Why is not enough just to use the r=x+y+z?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One doesn't need to lagrangian mech. to enounter, xi+yj+zk, Newtonian would do. x+y+z is just a number, which is different from (x,y,z), an ordered triplet. The i,j,k specify the directions.
 
It's merely a notational preference.
 
I did not mean it so simply. It has to do with equations of motion, that they are independent of basis. So any elaboration in this regard would be very much appreciated. Why do the equations of motion become independent of basis when we introduce the i,j,k vectors?
 
erg... xi+yj+zk is not independent of basis, the standard basis is being used here. i,j,k are e1,e2,e3.
xi+yi+zk=x(1,0,0)+y(0,1,0)+z(0,0,1)=(x,y,z)

or maybe I am wrong, though this is how this things were shown in some books i have at home(30 years old or so, from uni of california)
 
It's because i,j,k are Cartesian rectangular co-ordiantes: the preferred basis for Newtonian mechanics. Newton's eqns. look ugly in anything other than Cartesian coordinates. So when doing Newton's physics in a Cartesian basis, the vectors themselves don't feature in the equations, so it appears as if they're not really there.

When doing physics in other co-ordinate systems, the basis vectors also appear in the equations. If you tried doing non-Lagrangian (i.e. simpler Newtonian mechanics) in a non-Cartesian basis the basis vectors would still feature. e.g. try finding the equations of motion in planar polar co-ordinates using just Newton and differentiating vectors: you'll (obviously) get the same result that Lagrangian mechanics would give you.

note: I've made the simple association with basis vectors and co-ordinate systems using the notion of the co-ordinate basis.
 
Thanks Masudr!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K