Positively charged plastic rod of length L

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at a specific point due to a positively charged plastic rod with a given length and uniform linear charge density. The original poster presents an attempt at a solution using a formula but indicates that the result is incorrect.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula used by the original poster, with some suggesting there may be an error in the setup. There are references to integrals and the need to consider upper and lower limits in the calculation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the formula's correctness, with some participants providing guidance on potential errors and clarifications regarding the integral approach. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the formula should reflect the integration limits and that there may be a misunderstanding in the application of the formula. The original poster's calculations are questioned, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Kas0988
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


25-36.jpg


The figure shows a positively charged plastic rod of length L = 2.40 m and uniform linear charge density 8.00×10-3 C/m. Setting V= 0 at infinity, find the electric potential at point P for d = 1.536 m.


Homework Equations


asfd.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution


Alright, I plugged in the values to this formula. It should be setup as:
(2)*(8.99e9)*(8e-3)*ln[((2.4/4) + sqrt((2.4)^2/4 + (1.536)^2))/1.536]

All of this churns out to be 72811647.46708032. However, this is not correct. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been away from this for a long time, but I think there may be an error in your formula. It should have the form of the difference between an upper and a lower value of an integral. Check out this thread
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=296367
and note that it uses x in place of your d.
 
Kas0988 said:



The Attempt at a Solution


Alright, I plugged in the values to this formula. It should be setup as:
(2)*(8.99e9)*(8e-3)*ln[((2.4/4) + sqrt((2.4)^2/4+ (1.536)^2))/1.536]

All of this churns out to be 72811647.46708032. However, this is not correct. Any ideas?


You have a mistake when plugging in the data, this is the correct formula for the figure on the left:

(2)*(8.99e9)*(8e-3)*ln[((2.4/2) + sqrt((2.4)^2/4+ (1.536)^2))/1.536]

ehild
 
Delphi51 said:
I've been away from this for a long time, but I think there may be an error in your formula. It should have the form of the difference between an upper and a lower value of an integral.

Delphi, the formula is OK, the integral is taken between x=0 and x=L/2, and doubled.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K