Possible to calculate the strength of a nuclear explosion from a photo?

Click For Summary
Calculating the strength of a nuclear explosion from a photo requires knowing the distance from the camera and the fireball's radius at a specific time. G.I. Taylor's method, which uses dimensional analysis, is a key reference for estimating yield, as demonstrated during the Trinity test. A notable anecdote involves Enrico Fermi, who estimated the yield by observing paper displacement. Additionally, modern seismic readings can also estimate the strength of underground nuclear tests, although this method is more complex. Overall, these calculations highlight the effectiveness of dimensional analysis and basic physics in understanding nuclear explosions.
CPW
Messages
51
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
I read that a student in a physics class was told that one can calculate the strength of a nuclear explosion from the photo of a mushroom cloud from the explosion. I assume the dimensions of the cloud can be determined from the photo.

But what are the details of this calculation?
Details of this calculation from the photo?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
To start with you need to know how far away was the camera.
 
I think you're probably referring to G.I. Taylor's calculation of the yield of the Trinity nuclear test using dimensional analysis. Here is a link to that calculation. You need to know the radius of the fireball at a particular time, so you either need a movie, or you need a single still photo with the knowledge of how long after the detonation it was taken.
 
  • Like
Likes DEvens and CPW
My favorite was the anecdote about Enrico Fermi at the Trinity test. He estimated the yield by dropping a scrap of paper at the right moment and noting the horizontal displacement before hitting the ground.

Source: I'm not sure but perhaps "The Making of the Atomic Bomb"
 
  • Like
Likes CPW
I just reviewed the link to the GI Taylor calculation (link above from phyzguy), and I understand the dimensional analysis. I appreciate the approximations made, and so I think that the answer is in the correct order of magnitude.

In fact, I find this calculation very interesting and a useful demonstration of the power of dimensional analysis and basic physics.

Related to this calculation is the claim that we can calculate from seismic readings (modern military seismic network, leftover from the cold war) the strength of an underground nuclear weapon test far away. Like the GI Taylor calculation this is very interesting, but is certainly a more involved calculation.
 
What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
538
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
22K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K