Calculating Potential Difference Between Parallel Wires with Charge Densities

  • Thread starter Thread starter pidoctor314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Wires
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the potential difference between two parallel wires with charge densities +λ and -λ, separated by a distance d, under the assumption that d >> a (where a is the radius of the wires). The electric field (E) for one wire is given by E = λ / (2πe₀r). Participants confirm the use of Gauss's law to derive the electric field and potential, emphasizing the need to integrate the electric field to find the total potential difference. The correct approach involves calculating the electric field from both wires and then integrating to find the potential difference at the midpoint.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric fields and potentials
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions in physics
  • Basic calculus for integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field calculations for cylindrical charge distributions
  • Review integration techniques for calculating electric potential
  • Explore the concept of capacitance in parallel wire systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone studying electrostatics or working on problems involving electric fields and potentials in parallel wire configurations.

pidoctor314
Two wires (radius a) with charge densities +λ and -λ are placed parellel to on another a distance d away. Find an expression for the potential difference between the wires and simplify with the assumption the d>>a.
From that I need to find the potential difference at the midpoint between the two wires.

I have figured out the E field and potential for one wire (the first part of the problem). For outside one wire, E= λ /((2pi)(eo)(r). I'm not really sure how to approach this - find the E field of this first?) Any tips would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you want the assumption d<<a so that you can use Gauss's law and treat them as parallel plates. Yes, you would want to find the E field first, then go to potential, and then use the definition of capacitance.
 
The page definitely says d>>a. Perhaps a typo?
This is the work I have so far...anyone mind telling me if I'm on the right track or not?

V(on -) = [λ/(2pi)(e0)] x ln[x/a]
V(on +) = [-λ/(2pi)(e0)] x ln[(d-x)/a]
then add them together?
 
Ohhh, I think I see the picture now. Sorry, I thought it was that there was some gap between two wires butted up against each other. Instead, they are two wires above and below each other, some distance away?

Are the wires very long? In other words, can we exploit Gauss' Law, or do we have to do the integrals? It looks like you have used Gauss's law, so I assume it is fine to assume "very long."

So then we just want to use

V = - \int \mathbf{E} \cdot d \mathbf{l}

So, yes, to get the total field E you want to add the two together. You will see that they cancel outside the gap and add inside the gap.
 
Oh wait, you added the potentials, no you don't want to do that. You want to get the total electric field, and then do the integral.
 
the wire is "very long", and they are parellel wires...
so I can use Gauss's law for finding E?
 
Yes, you can use Gauss' law. You already said the result of Gauss' law in your first post, so just use that. Then you need to integrate, which is where the d>>a comes into play.
 
Electric potential is a scalar quantity (U/q), and it is simply equal to negative the path integral of the electric field. The functions for electric field are continuous at the outer edge of the wires, so you simply have to find the net potential at the two wire edges and use that to find the potential difference. If one rod is +L (L being landa) and the other is -L, then they should technically counter each other.
 
pidoctor 314, you wouldn't happen to be taking a Physics 217 take-home final exam at Cornell, would you? Keep in mind that your email address is linked to this forum account.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
848
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
984
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K