Potential difference between the center of a sphere and a point 4.0 cm away?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of electric potential difference between the center of a non-conducting sphere and a point 4.0 cm away. Participants clarify that using the formula V = kQ/r is insufficient for this scenario, as it does not account for the potential created by the sphere's charge distribution. Instead, integrating the electric field (E) from 0 to 0.04 m is necessary to accurately determine the potential difference. The correct approach involves recognizing that the potential at the origin is zero and that the potential difference must account for contributions from both the sphere and external charges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and electric fields
  • Familiarity with the formula V = kQ/r
  • Knowledge of integration in the context of physics
  • Concept of charge density in spherical coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from electric field using integration
  • Learn about charge density and its implications in spherical symmetry
  • Explore the concept of potential at infinity in electrostatics
  • Investigate the differences between conducting and non-conducting spheres in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone studying electrostatics who seeks to deepen their understanding of electric potential calculations in spherical charge distributions.

hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
A nonconducting sphere of radius 10 cm is charged uniformly with a density of 100 nC/m^3. What is the magnitude of the potential difference between the center and a point 4.0 cm away?

The answer is 3.0 V.
Relevant Equations
V = kQ / r
I can use integral as attached to obtain the answer.
However, I wonder why I can not use " V = KQ / r " the get the correct answer.
Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    23.3 KB · Views: 279
Physics news on Phys.org
hidemi said:
However, I wonder why I can not use " V = KQ / r " the get the correct answer.
Thanks.
How exactly did you use that? E.g. what value for Q?
 
The Q value I plug in is density*4pi/3*r^3, so V = k (density*4pi/3*r^2)
My confusion is that instead of using V = kQ/r directly, we integrate electric field (E) to calculate the potential (V) to obtain the correct answer?
 
hidemi said:
The Q value I plug in is density*4pi/3*r^3, so V = k (density*4pi/3*r^2)
My confusion is that instead of using V = kQ/r directly, we integrate electric field (E) to calculate the potential (V) to obtain the correct answer?
kQ/r would be the potential at a point P at radius r, ignoring any charges outside radius r, and taking the potential at infinity to be zero. This is not the same as finding the potential difference between P and the origin, O.
There is a potential due to the charges beyond radius r, but that is the same for both P and O. The difference is that the sphere within radius r creates a potential at O. Since you want the difference in potentials, this needs to be subtracted from kQ/r.
 
haruspex said:
kQ/r would be the potential at a point P at radius r, ignoring any charges outside radius r, and taking the potential at infinity to be zero. This is not the same as finding the potential difference between P and the origin, O.
There is a potential due to the charges beyond radius r, but that is the same for both P and O. The difference is that the sphere within radius r creates a potential at O. Since you want the difference in potentials, this needs to be subtracted from kQ/r.
I know V at origin is 0 for nonconducting sphere. I just wonder why can't we plug in 0.04m directly into the equation to get the potential difference, instead we need to integrate the electric field from 0-0.04m to calculate the potential?
 
$$V(B)-V(A)=-\int_{\vec r_A}^{\vec r_B} \vec E \cdot d\vec l$$
Let's compute ##\vec E##
 
hidemi said:
I know V at origin is 0 for nonconducting sphere.
No, the field there is zero.
Potential is, in principle, relative. A common standard is to take the potential at infinity to be zero. Everywhere else, it is the sum of potentials due to all charges present.
If the only charge being considered is Q on a spherical shell radius R then the potential everywhere in the shell is kQ/R.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hidemi
haruspex said:
No, the field there is zero.
Potential is, in principle, relative. A common standard is to take the potential at infinity to be zero. Everywhere else, it is the sum of potentials due to all charges present.
If the only charge being considered is Q on a spherical shell radius R then the potential everywhere in the shell is kQ/R.
Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
726
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
583
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
681
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K