Potential energy in a Mass spring system

Click For Summary
In a mass-spring system, the rate of change of potential energy matches the rate of change of kinetic energy due to the conservation of total energy. To determine this rate, one can analyze the harmonic oscillator's trajectory using the equation x(t)=Acos(ωt)+Bsin(ωt) and apply it to the potential energy formula V(t)=1/2 kx(t)^2. By differentiating both potential and kinetic energy with respect to time and comparing the results, it becomes evident that the changes are interdependent. The derived equations show that the rate of change is influenced by cos(ωt), confirming the energy conservation principle. Thus, any decrease in potential energy corresponds to an increase in kinetic energy, maintaining the system's total energy constant.
Asad Raza
Messages
81
Reaction score
3
Why is the rate of change of potential energy always same the rate of change of kinetic energy in a mass spring system?
Additiinally, How do we determine the rate of change of potential energy in such case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The total energy in a mass spring system is conserved and so any decrease in one form of energy should result in an increase in another because otherwise the total energy would change.
To determine the rate of change of potential energy:
Step1) Consider the most general trajectory for a harmonic oscillator:## x(t)=A\cos \omega t+B\sin\omega t ##
Step2) Put ##x(t)## in ## V(t)=\frac 1 2 kx(t)^2=\frac 1 2 m\omega^2 x(t)^2 ##.
Step3) Differentiate ## V(t) ## w.r.t. time.
Step4) Differentiate ## K(t) ## w.r.t. time.(you calculated it here!)
Step5) Compare the results from Step3 and Step4.
 
  • Like
Likes TJGilb
Think about conservation of energy with regards to a mass-spring system: ##\frac 1 2 m {\frac {dx} {dt}}^2+mg(h-x)+\frac 1 2 kx^2=constant## where h is the max height. Imagine we drop it from when the displacement in the spring is zero. Putting this in terms of time we can get

##\frac 1 2 m(A \omega sin(\omega t))^2+mg(h-Acos(\omega t))+\frac 1 2 k(Acos(\omega t))^2=constant##

Taking the rate of change with respect to time we get

##mA^2 \omega^3 sin(\omega t)cos(\omega t)+mgA \omega sin(\omega t)-kA^2 cos(\omega t)sin(\omega t)=0##

Putting the rate of change of the potential energies on one side and the kinetic energy on the other, we get

##mA^2 \omega^3 sin(\omega t)cos(\omega t)=kA^2 cos(\omega t)sin(\omega t)-mgA \omega sin(\omega t)##

which simplifies to

##mA\omega^3 cos(\omega t) = kAcos(\omega t)-mg\omega##.

As you can see, the rate of change is driven by ##cos(\omega t)## for both.

This was quick and dirty, so if I made any errors somewhere, someone feel free to correct me.
 
I built a device designed to brake angular velocity which seems to work based on below, i used a flexible shaft that could bow up and down so i could visually see what was happening for the prototypes. If you spin two wheels in opposite directions each with a magnitude of angular momentum L on a rigid shaft (equal magnitude opposite directions), then rotate the shaft at 90 degrees to the momentum vectors at constant angular velocity omega, then the resulting torques oppose each other...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K