Potential energy in case of Atwood machine

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the calculation of potential energy in an Atwood machine scenario, specifically addressing the equations of motion for two masses. The derived equations show that the acceleration of the heavier mass is ##a_1 = -g/3## and the lighter mass's acceleration is ##a_2 = g/3##. The change in potential energy for the heavier mass is calculated as ##\Delta U_1 = -2mg^2/6##, while for the lighter mass, it is ##\Delta U_2 = mg^2/6##, leading to a total change in potential energy of ##\Delta U = -mg^2/6##. The value of mass ##m## was clarified through user contributions, ultimately determining ##m = 1.22 kg## and ##\Delta U = 19.6 J##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with potential energy concepts
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic manipulation
  • Experience with Atwood machine dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion for Atwood machines
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Explore advanced problems involving multiple masses and pulleys
  • Investigate the effects of friction on Atwood machine calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of Atwood machines and potential energy calculations.

rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
Homework Statement
The heavier block in an Atwood machine has a mass twice that of lighter one. The tension in the string is 16N when the system is set into motion. Find the decrease in U(GPE) during the first sec after the system is released from rest.
Relevant Equations
##F_{net}=ma##
##s=ut+1/2at^2##
##\Delta U=mgh##
##T-2mg=2ma_1## (acceleration of heavier mass)
##T-mg=ma_2##
(##-a_1=a_2##)

On solving the eqns, ##a_1=-g/3=-a_2##

##s=1/2at^2##
##s=-g/6## , distance covered by heavier mass.
##s=g/6## , covered by lighter mass.

Edit: ##\Delta U_1=mgh=-2mg^2/6## (decrease in U of heavier mass)
##\Delta U_2=mgh=mg^2/6## (increase in U of lighter mass)
##\Delta U=\Delta U_1+\Delta U_2=-mg^2/6##

Now what is m?
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    35.3 KB · Views: 155
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have not used all of the information in the problem.
 
You haven't yet told us what you think it is ! (Or how you arrived at ##\Delta U=-mg^2/6##)
 
Steve4Physics said:
You haven't yet told us what you think it is ! (Or how you arrived at ##\Delta U=-mg^2/6##)
I don’t know m. It’s not given. Also I have edited the post. I thought it’s pretty clear but anyways.
 
rudransh verma said:
I don’t know m.
Because
Orodruin said:
You have not used all of the information in the problem.
 
rudransh verma said:
I don’t know m. It’s not given. Also I have edited the post. I thought it’s pretty clear but anyways.
The question should, ideally, state what ##m## is. But the author has assumed it is clear from the information given in the question.

So, as already suggested by @Orodruin and @haruspex, read the question again and take a guess at what you think ##m## is. What is your best guess?

(You can then find ##\Delta U## based on your guess.)


Sorry @rudranch verma. Based on your original (pre-editted) Post #1, I thought you were asking 'what does ##m## represent?

But it looks like you want the value of ##m##. See @Orodruin's and @haruspex's posts.
 
Last edited:
Orodruin said:
You have not used all of the information in the problem.
Got it! 4mg/3=16, m= 1.22 kg
##\Delta U= 19.6 J##
Thank you!
It’s not very clear when is T=16N but I think it’s during motion. That’s how I wrote the eqns.
 
Steve4Physics said:
@rudranch verma. Based
It’s Rudransh.
 
rudransh verma said:
It’s Rudransh.
In Post #6 I typed the @ symbol followed by your PF user name: rudranch verma.

The system should have automatically converted it into a link, and rendered it blue. It didn't!

I'll try it again here: @rudransh verma

Yea - seems to work now.
 
  • #10
rudransh verma said:
Also I have edited the post.
Do not edit posts after someone has replied. If you want to add information to your post or provide a necessary clarification, do so in a followup post.

Editing a post after it has become part of an active discussion is unfair to the people who are volunteering their help, makes it impossible for anyone else to follow the thread, and is fundamentally dishonest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS, phinds, Steve4Physics and 6 others
  • #11
Nugatory said:
Do not edit posts after someone has replied. If you want to add information to your post or provide a necessary clarification, do so in a followup post.
I always cut the sentences or mention edit: I didn’t do that in this thread. I forgot. But I’ll mention now.
Steve4Physics said:
In Post #6 I typed the @ symbol followed by your PF user name: rudranch verma.
Ranch is a sauce. Rudra(shiva)-nsh(part) means “Part of Shiva”:partytime:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
  • #12
rudransh verma said:
I always cut the sentences or mention edit: I didn’t do that in this thread. I forgot. But I’ll mention now.
As stated: Just don’t edit the first posts in threads that have answers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and rudransh verma
  • #13
rudransh verma said:
Ranch is a sauce. Rudra(shiva)-nsh(part) means “Part of Shiva”:partytime:
Apologies. I only just realized that I mistyped 'ch' instead of 'sh'.
 
  • #14
rudransh verma said:
Got it! 4mg/3=16, m= 1.22 kg
##\Delta U= 19.6 J##
...
Why 4mg?
 
  • #15
Lnewqban said:
Why 4mg?
Because 1 + 1/3 = 4/3.
 
  • #16
It is better to follow the rules than to explain why they don't apply to you.

This whole thread has been an exercise in guessing. Perhaps this problem is at too high a level?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
700
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K