Potential energy in concentric shells

  • Thread starter gracy
  • Start date
  • #1
2,486
83

Homework Statement


There are two concentric shells of radii a and b respectively ,inner shell has charge Q and outer shell is neutral what will be potential energy of outer shell due to inner shell

Homework Equations


##V##=##\frac{KQ}{R}##

PE=Charge .V

The Attempt at a Solution


I know what will be potential of outer shell due to inner shell it will be ##\frac{KQ}{b}## but as outer shell is neutral it does not have any charge and hence potential energy of outer shell should be zero,because we know potential energy is equal to charge multiplied by potential. charge is zero on outer shell hence it's PE would also be zero.Right?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
34,856
6,125

Homework Statement


There are two concentric shells of radii a and b respectively ,inner shell has charge Q and outer shell is neutral what will be potential energy of outer shell due to inner shell

Homework Equations


##V##=##\frac{KQ}{R}##

PE=Charge .V

The Attempt at a Solution


I know what will be potential of outer shell due to inner shell it will be ##\frac{KQ}{b}## but as outer shell is neutral it does not have any charge and hence potential energy of outer shell should be zero,because we know potential energy is equal to charge multiplied by potential. charge is zero on outer shell hence it's PE would also be zero.Right?
Sounds good to me.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #3
BvU
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2019 Award
13,703
3,341
Hello Gracy,

Right !
It looks to me as if you sense a contradiction somewhere ?
The electric field ( in 'all of space' ) with the outer shell in place is identical to the electric field without, so putting it in place shouldn't require energy.
I wouldn't say
potential of outer shell due to inner shell will be ##\frac{KQ}{b}##
but

potential at r = radius of outer shell due to inner shell will be ##\frac{KQ}{b}##

[edit] this time haru was faster !
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #4
2,486
83
Ok.There is a question.

A solid conducting sphere of radius a having a charge Q is surrounded by a conducting shell of inner radius 2a and outer radius 3a as shown.Find the amount of heat produced when switch is closed.
Heat produced=Initial energy -final energy
calculation.png


calc.png


I have taken interaction energy to be zero on the basis of the answer of OP.And I have considered formula of self energy of conducting and and non conducting spheres to be same.
I know formula of self energy of conducting sphere is ##\frac{KQ^2}{2R}##

Heat produced=##\frac{KQ^2}{4a}## - ##\frac{KQ^2}{6a}##

= ##\frac{KQ^2}{12a}##

But it is wrong!
 
  • #5
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,858
3,213
In your original question, the outer shell was assumed to have negligible thickness so that the charge on the inner surface of that shell was essentially at the same location as the charge on the outer surface of the shell.

But now the outer shell has a significant thickness. You will need to reassess the initial potential energy.
 
  • Like
Likes haruspex and gracy
  • #6
2,486
83
the outer shell was assumed to have negligible thickness so that the charge on the inner surface of that shell was essentially at the same location as the charge on the outer surface of the shell.
But I wrote the outer shell is neutral.So no charge in inner or outer surface of the outer shell.
 
  • #7
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,858
3,213
The net charge is zero on the outer shell (initially). But, the inner and outer surfaces each have charge.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #8
2,486
83
The net charge is zero on the outer shell (initially). But, the inner and outer surfaces each have charge.
Are you hinting at induced charges?
 
  • #9
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,858
3,213
Are you hinting at induced charges?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #10
2,486
83
But now the outer shell has a significant thickness.
Why do you think that ?There is nothing such mentioned in the problem.
 
  • #11
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,858
3,213
Why do you think that ?There is nothing such mentioned in the problem.
According to the statement of the problem, the outer shell has an inner radius of 2a and an outer radius of 3a.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #12
2,486
83
You will need to reassess the initial potential energy.
What kind of changes shall I make in my calculations now?I don't know what is self energy of shells having significant thickness and I also don't know how to calculate interaction energy in such situation.
 
  • #13
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,858
3,213
If you have a system of static charges where an amount of charge Q1 is located where the potential is V1, an amount of charge Q2 is located where the potential is V2, and an amount of charge Q3 is located where the potential is V3, then the total potential energy of the system is

U = (1/2) (Q1V1 + Q2V2 + Q3V3)

This is a generalization of the formula for the potential energy of a capacitor: U = (1/2)QV.

Try to apply this to your system where you have three charges: charge on the sphere, charge on the inner surface of the shell, and charge on the outer surface of the shell.

U = (1/2) (QsphereVsphere + QinnerVinner + QouterVouter)

You should find that the last two terms simplify nicely. The work will be in getting the first term.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #14
2,486
83
U = (1/2) (QsphereVsphere + QinnerVinner + QouterVouter)
I solved it as follows
last.png



But it is not correct where I went wrong.
 
  • #15
ehild
Homework Helper
15,541
1,907
Why are the potentials at the surfaces of the outer shell different ?
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #16
2,486
83
I calculated it. Just the sign is opposite.
 
  • #17
ehild
Homework Helper
15,541
1,907
I calculated it. Just the sign is opposite.
You did not show your calculation. The outer shell is a conductor. What do you know about the distribution of potential on a conductor?
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #18
2,486
83
What do you know about the distribution of potential on a conductor?
That it is same everywhere inside the conductor.
 
  • #19
2,486
83
  • #20
ehild
Homework Helper
15,541
1,907
That it is same everywhere inside the conductor.
Is it different on the surfaces of the conductor?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #21
2,486
83
Is it different on the surface of the conductor?
No.
 
  • #22
ehild
Homework Helper
15,541
1,907
No.
Then your calculation is wrong if you got different potentials for the inner and outer surfaces of the same conductive shell.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #23
2,486
83
Yes but what is wrong in my calculation that I want to know.
 
  • #24
ehild
Homework Helper
15,541
1,907
You can not calculate the potential so.
 
  • #25
2,486
83
You can not calculate the potential so.
I did not understand .potential of what?
 

Related Threads on Potential energy in concentric shells

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
653
Replies
82
Views
11K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
999
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
341
Top