Potential in spherical shells

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on potential in spherical shells, the potential inside the inner shell (r < a) is defined as V_o. For the region between the inner and outer shells (a < r < 2a), the potential is expressed as V(r) = V_o - ∫^r_a E*dl, which some participants found confusing. The shell theorem indicates that the electric field (E) outside the outer shell (r > 2a) is zero, leading to a potential of zero at r = 2a. The potential difference between the two shells remains constant, with the potential at the inner shell being V_o, derived from the relationship between the potentials and the constants involved. Ultimately, the combined potential function aligns with the established boundary conditions at r = a and r = 2a.
per persson
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Two concentric spherical metal shells have radius a and 2a. The inner shell has potential V_o and the outer shell is grounded. In r<a, a<r<2a and r>2a there is vacuum. Determine the potential everywhere.
Relevant Equations
$V(r)=\int^{r}_{O}E\cdot dl$

Attachments

  • 20240913_112750.jpg
    20240913_112750.jpg
    30.2 KB · Views: 50
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
per persson said:
I dont know how to write math symbols here
To learn how to do it here, please click "LaTeX Guide" lower left above "Attach files".

The general expression for the potential function is $$V(r)-V(\text{ref})=-\int_{\text{ref}}^r \mathbf E \cdot ~d\mathbf r$$ where the potential is zero at ##r=\text{ref}.## Here the potential is zero at ##r=2a##.
You can adapt this expression to (a) region II, ##2a\leq r \leq \infty## and (b) region I, ##0\leq r \leq a##.

It would be easier not to involve integrals and invoke the Uniqueness theorem. Just write $$
V(r) =
\begin{cases}
A_I+\dfrac{B_I}{r}, & 0\leq r \leq a \\
A_{II}+\dfrac{B_{II}}{r}, & 2a\leq r \leq \infty \\
\end{cases}$$ and impose the boundary conditions at ##r=a##, and ##r=2a## to find the constants.
 
per persson said:
I don't understand why in a<r<2a, ##V(r)=V_o-\int^r_a E*dl## I would write ##V(r)=\int^r_a E*dl+\int^{2a}_\infty E*dl##
I've put ## ##\LaTeX## tags on your formula above and supplied braces around the ##2a## superscript.

As written, you are integrating inward from infinity toward the outer shell and outward from the inner shell to the selected radius. That makes little sense to me. The formula would yield the difference in potential differences across two disconnected intervals.

By the shell theorem, we can quickly see that if the potential at ##r=2a## is zero then the potential everywhere outside with ##r > 2a## is also zero. It follows that ##E## is zero in the exterior of the outer shell and ##\int^{2a}_\infty E * dl = 0##. It also follows that the net charges on the two shells are equal and opposite.

If you want the potential at ##r##, you could use the reference potential of ##0## at ##2a## and integrate inward. Or you could use the reference potential of ##V_o## at ##a## and integrate outward.

Both require knowing ##E##. So I would choose to do neither. [E is calculable from the givens here, but we have no need to do the calculation as long as we already understand that spherical shells have ##\frac{1}{r}## potentials]

Consider the potential in the absence of the outer shell. It is ##K## at ##r=a## and ##\frac{K}{2}## at ##r=2a##. The potential difference between the two shells is ##\frac{K}{2}##.

Consider the potential difference in the presence of the outer shell. The potentials in the region from ##r=a## to ##r=2a## will all be offset by a fixed constant from the above. The potential differences within the region will remain unchanged.

In particular, the potential difference from ##r=a## to ##r=2a## will remain unchanged at ##\frac{K}{2}##. Since we know the potential at the outer shell is zero, this means that the potential at the inner shell will be ##\frac{K}{2} = V_o##. It follows that ##K = 2V_o##.

The potential function from just the inner shell will be ##P = \frac{Ka}{r} = \frac{2V_oa}{r}##.

If we look at the boundary conditions (the known potentials at ##r=a## or ##r=2a##) we can compute that the offset for the presence of the outer shell will be ##\frac{K}{2}##.

The potential function from both shells combined will be ##P=\frac{Ka}{r} - \frac{K}{2} = \frac{2V_oa}{r} - V_o##. For ##a \le r \le 2a##.

By no coincidence this fits our boundary conditions of ##V_o## at ##r=a## and ##0## at ##r=2a##.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top