Potential of a charged ring in terms of Legendre polynomials

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at a point due to a charged ring of radius \( a \). The original poster attempts to derive the potential using an integral involving Legendre polynomials, but their result does not match the textbook answer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expansion of the potential in terms of Legendre polynomials and question the assumptions made regarding the angles involved in the calculation. There are suggestions to consider the azimuthal angle and its impact on the potential's symmetry.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the assumptions about angles and the symmetry of the potential. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the expansion and integration, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct method yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the potential being calculated for regions both inside and outside the charged ring, which raises questions about the validity of certain assumptions made in the original poster's approach.

patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
find the potential of a charged ring in terms of Legendre polynomials
Relevant Equations
dV = kdq/|r-r'|, k is set =1
hi guys
I am trying to calculate the the potential at any point P due to a charged ring with a radius = a, but my answer didn't match the one on the textbook, I tried by using
$$
V = \int\frac{\lambda ad\phi}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|}
$$
by evaluating the integral and expanding denominator in terms of Legendre i got the following answer
$$
V = 2\pi\lambda\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}P_{n}(cos\theta)\left(\frac{r}{a}\right)^{n}\qquad,for\;\;a>r
$$
but the book answer was
$$
V = 2\pi\lambda\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}(2n)!}{2^{2n}(n!)^{2}}P_{2n}(cos\theta)\left(\frac{r}{a}\right)^{2n}\qquad,for\;\;a>r
$$
what I am doing wrong
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you write out your working? I think you should only get even-numbered polynomials.
 
ergospherical said:
Can you write out your working? I think you should only get even-numbered polynomials.
I expanded the inverse of $|\vect{r}-\vect{r^'}|$ as follows
$$
\left|\vec{r}-\vec{r^{'}}\right|^{-1}=\left(r^2+a^2-2ra\cos\theta\right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}=\frac{1}{a}\left(1-2\frac{r}{a}\cos\theta+\frac{r^2}{a^2}\right)^{\frac{-1}{2}},
$$
comparing with the generating function of the Legendre polynomials, I got
$$
V=2\pi\lambda\left(1-2\frac{r}{a}\cos\theta+\frac{r^2}{a^2}\right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}=2\pi\lambda\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}P_n\left(\cos\theta\right)\left(\frac{r}{a}\right)^{n}.
$$
 
You incorrectly assumed the angle between ##\vec r## and ##\vec r'## is ##\theta##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
vela said:
You incorrectly assumed the angle between ##\vec r## and ##\vec r'## is ##\theta##.
Isn't it just ##\theta##!
potential.png
 
The vectors are not necessarily at the same azimuthal angle ##\phi##.
 
ergospherical said:
The vectors are not necessarily at the same azimuthal angle ##\phi##.
How should I take care of this in the expansion of ##|\vec{r}-\vec{r^{'}}|^{-1}##?
 
Write ##\mathbf{r}## and ##\mathbf{r}’## as Cartesian vectors and evaluate ##\mathbf{r} \cdot \mathbf{r}’## that way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: graphking
ergospherical said:
The vectors are not necessarily at the same azimuthal angle ##\phi##.
I think we should find a way to dispense with the azimuthal angle entirely since this is an axis-symmetric potential.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical
  • #10
PhDeezNutz said:
I think we should find a way to dispense with the azimuthal angle entirely since this is an axis-symmetric potential.
If ##\mathbf{r}## is at azimuthal angle ##\phi## and ##\mathbf{r}'## is at azimuthal angle ##\phi'##, then the expansion of ##|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}'|^{-1}## contains terms in ##\cos^k{(\phi - \phi')}##. This azimuthal dependence vanishes upon integrating over ##\phi'## from ##0## to ##2\pi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: graphking and PhDeezNutz
  • #11
OP

The general form of an axis symmetric potential in the near region is

##\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} A_n r^n P_n \left( \cos \theta \right)##

Treating the on-axis potential in the near region ##\theta = 0## makes all of the Legendre Polynomials equal to 1 ; ##P_n \left( \cos 0 \right) = P_n \left( 1 \right) = 1## for all n.

So the on-axis potential is

##\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} A_n r^n##

Once you find the on-axis Taylor Expansion you just slap on the relevant Legendre Polynomials

On axis ##r = z##

## \Phi \left( z \right) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}} R \, d \phi' = \frac{\lambda}{2 \epsilon_0} \frac{R}{\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}}##

Invoke the smallness parameter ##r \ll R## and taylor expand

Hint: ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+x^2}} = 1 - \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{3x^4}{8} - \frac{5x^6}{16} + \frac{35x^8}{128}##

This hint matches up with the coefficients in your desired answer.

I wouldn't worry about expanding the whole thing, matching the first few terms is enough to draw a conclusion IMO.

Edit: I was more or less copying and pasting one of my posts from another thread. So just chanage ##R## to ##a##
 
  • #12
In post #1 you state "I am trying to calculate the the potential at any point P ##\dots##"

Doesn't that include the region ##r>a##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
  • #13
If memory serves me correctly, there is a trick to finding it easily for all \vec{r}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
  • #14
It's easier to think in terms of the Green's function,
$$V(\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 G(|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|) \rho(\vec{x}').$$
Of course
$$G(\vec{x}-\vec{x}')=\frac{1}{4 \pi |\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|} \; \Rightarrow \; \Delta_x G(\vec{x}-\vec{x}')=\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{x}').$$
The multipole expansion is then derived from the multipole expansion of the Green's function,
$$G(\vec{x}-\vec{x}') = \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-l}^l \frac{4 \pi}{2l+1} \frac{r_{<}^l}{r_{>}^{l+1}} \mathrm{Y}_{lm}^*(\vartheta',\varphi') \mathrm{Y}_{lm}(\vartheta,\varphi).$$
Here ##r_<=\text{min}(r,r')## and ##r_{>}=\text{max}(r,r')##, and I used the spherical harmonics normalized to 1, i.e.,
$$\int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \vartheta \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \varphi \sin \vartheta \mathrm{Y}_{l'm'}^*(\vartheta,\varphi) \mathrm{Y}_{lm}(\vartheta,\varphi)=\delta_{ll'} \delta_{mm'}.$$
The relation to the Legendre polynomials for axisymmetric problems (rotational symmetry around the ##z## axis) is
$$\mathrm{Y}_{l0}(\vartheta,\varphi)=\sqrt{\frac{2l+1}{4 \pi}} P_l(\cos \vartheta).$$
Of course all ##\mathrm{Y}_{l0}## do not depend on ##\varphi##, because ##\mathrm{Y}_{lm}(\vartheta,\varphi) \propto \exp(\mathrm{i} m \varphi)##. The orthogonality relation thus is
$$\int_{-1}^1 \mathrm{d} u P_{l'}(u) P_{l}(u)=\frac{2}{2l+1} \delta_{ll'}.$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and ergospherical
  • #15
  • #16
How meaningful is this multipole expansion for ##(r_{<},~r_{>})\approx a## when ##\vartheta = \frac{\pi}{2}##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
  • #17
I'm not sure, whether there's a misunderstanding concerning my convention. In my notation ##\vartheta## is the polar and ##\varphi## the azimuthal angle, i.e., the relation between Cartesian and spherical coordinates of the position vector is
$$\vec{x}=\begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} r \cos \varphi \sin \vartheta \\ r \sin \varphi \sin \vartheta \\ r \cos \vartheta \end{pmatrix}, \quad r \in \mathbb{R}_{>0}, \quad \vartheta \in (0,\pi), \varphi \in [0,2 \pi).$$
The spherical coordinates are singular along the ##x_3##-axis, i.e., for ##\vartheta \in \{0,\pi \}##.

So the idea is to just use the expansion of the Green's function in terms of spherical harmonics
$$\frac{1}{4 \pi |\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|} = \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell} \frac{4 \pi}{2 \ell+1} \frac{r_>^{\ell}}{r^{\ell+1}} \mathrm{Y}_{\ell m}^*(\vartheta',\varphi') \mathrm{Y}_{\ell m}(\vartheta,\varphi).$$
Then the potential is given by (for ##r<a##, i.e., ##r_{>}=a## and ##r_{<}=r##, \quad ##\vartheta'=\pi/2##)
$$\Phi(\vec{x})=4 \pi \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \varphi' \frac{a \lambda}{4 \pi|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|} = 4 \pi \lambda \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \varphi' \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-\ell}^{m=\ell} \left (\frac{r}{a} \right)^{\ell} \mathrm{Y}_{\ell m}^*(\pi/2,\varphi') \mathrm{Y}(\vartheta,\varphi).$$
The integral makes all contributions with ##m \neq 0## vanish. Further
$$\text{Y}_{\ell 0}(\vartheta'=\pi/2)=\sqrt{\frac{2 \ell+1}{4 \pi}}
\mathrm{P}_{\ell}(0)=\begin{cases} \sqrt{\frac{2 \ell+1}{4 \pi}}
\frac{(-1)^{\ell/2} \ell!}{4^{\ell/2} (\ell/2)!^2} & \text{for} \quad
\ell \quad \text{even} \\ 0 & \text{for} \quad \ell \quad \text{odd}. \end{cases}$$
Plugging all this into the integral you should get the result of the textbook.

For ##r>a## the only difference is that instead of ##(r/a)^{\ell}## you have the factor ##(a/r)^{\ell+1}## in front.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and ergospherical

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K