Finding the Potential of a Charged Rod on the x-axis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential of a positively charged rod with charge Q, extending from -L/2 to L/2 on the x-axis. The potential V is derived using the equation V = ∫K*dQ/R, where dQ is expressed as λ*dx, and λ = Q/L. The correct limits of integration are established as -L/2 to L/2, with R defined as the distance from the point of interest to the charge element, specifically R = x - D. The final expression for the potential is V = Kλ[ln((x + L/2)/(x - L/2))], substituting λ with Q/L.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and charge distribution
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of the concept of linear charge density (λ)
  • Basic principles of electrostatics, including Coulomb's law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the concept of electric field and its relation to potential
  • Explore integration techniques for solving physics problems involving charge distributions
  • Investigate applications of logarithmic functions in physics, particularly in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to understand the calculation of electric potential from charged objects.

camira
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all,
I need to find the potential of a positively charged rod with charge Q. Assuming to the right as positive,the center of the rod is on the origin, and it extends to -L/2 in the negative x direction, and L/2 in the positive x direction.
There is a point at distance x, located to the right of the rod, on the x axis.
I have to express the answer in terms of the variables Q, L, x, and appropriate constants.

Homework Equations


V= ∫K*dQ/R
λ=Q/L

The Attempt at a Solution


I know this question has been asked here before, but I wasn't able to come to a conclusion about it myself based on these posts...so here we go:
I started by choosing an arbitrary point on the rod, called dQ, that is a distance dx away from the point.
λ=dQ/dx
dQ=λ*dx
I have my equation
V=∫K*dQ/R
sub in for dQ
V=∫K*λ*dx/R
I know I need to integrate over the length of the rod. So i decided to use the bounds as 0 to L/2, and then multiply the integral by 2.
This is where I am stuck. I don't know what the value for R is...I am leaning towards x+L..but I am not sure. Also I seem to have gotten rid of my Q variable..so I am not sure I should have subbed in λ*dx for it...
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
camira said:
I started by choosing an arbitrary point on the rod, called dQ, that is a distance dx away from the point.
x is a finite distance away from the end of the rod. What you say here makes no sense to me.
Consider various elements of charge dQ = λ dx along the rod. The element of dQ closest to x will be at what distance from x? The element of charge dQ farthest from x will be at what distance from x? So what should be your limits of integration?
 
rude man said:
x is a finite distance away from the end of the rod. What you say here makes no sense to me.
Consider various elements of charge dQ = λ dx along the rod. The element of dQ closest to x will be at what distance from x? The element of charge dQ farthest from x will be at what distance from x? So what should be your limits of integration?
The closest element of dQ to x will be...L/2 + x...I'm not sure about the furthest...I am thinking x+L?
I am still not sure about the radius R though, because the small section of charge being summed can be at any distance on the rod away from the set point.
 
If you already have an x axis, it's better to have point at position x, not at distance x (that's confusing). Make a drawing to find out what is meant with the variables involved. Also you want to clearly distinguish between the integration variable (I see a dx) and the ('fixed' *) x coordinate of the point where you want to calculate the potential.

*) 'during' the integration

So i decided to use the bounds as 0 to L/2, and then multiply the integral by 2.
Not wise. The integrand isn't the same for the other interval
 
Thanks everyone for the replies
After contemplating this further, I think I didn't do a very good job of conceptualizing the situation
So starting from the beginning:
Let's call the distance the point is away(so from the origin to the point) x.
Rod is the same -L/2 to L/2
The distance that my charge, dQ, is at, from the origin, is D.
λ=dQ/dD=Q/L, so λdD=(Q/L*dD)
I know that the distance from the point to my dQ is x-D, so R=x-D
I want to integrate from -L/2 to L/2
so:
K∫λdD/R
Kλ∫dD/(x-D)
Integrate:
Kλ [-ln (x-D)] from -L/2 to L/2
Kλ[-ln (x- L/2) + ln(x+L/2)]
using log rules:
Kλ[ln((x+L/2)/(x-L/2))
to express in terms of Q, just sub in for λ=Q/L
I think this is more accurate
 
camira said:
Kλ[ln((x+L/2)/(x-L/2))
to express in terms of Q, just sub in for λ=Q/L
I think this is more accurate
This is correct. Good!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
666
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K