Potential on the axis of a uniformly charged ring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential due to a uniformly charged ring. The potential is derived by integrating the contributions from each element of the ring, leading to the formula V = (λ/(2ε₀))(R/√(z²+R²)). There is emphasis on the importance of using the correct path for integration, as the electric field's circulation around the ring is zero. The initial approach was critiqued for not considering the field at points on the ring, which is essential for accurate potential calculation. Ultimately, the derived formula aligns with the expected result for the potential at a point along the axis of the charged ring.
Guillem_dlc
Messages
188
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
We have a uniformly charged ring of radius ##R## with a linear charge density ##\lambda##. Determine the potential at a point on its axis at a distance ##z## from the plane of the ring.

Answer: ##V=\dfrac{\lambda}{2\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{R}{\sqrt{z^2+R^2}}##
Relevant Equations
##V_z=\int E\cdot dl##
We know that
$$V_Z=\int_{\textrm{ring}} E\cdot dl$$
We therefore consider ##E=\dfrac{\lambda}{2\pi \varepsilon_0}\cdot \dfrac1r##. Then,
$$V_Z=\int_{\textrm{ring}} \dfrac{\lambda}{2\pi \varepsilon_0}\cdot \dfrac1r\, dl = \dfrac{\lambda}{2\pi \varepsilon_0}\dfrac1r \int_{\textrm{ring}}dl=$$
$$=\dfrac{\lambda}{\cancel{2\pi} \varepsilon_0}\dfrac1r \cancel{2\pi} R=\dfrac{\lambda}{\varepsilon_0}\cdot \dfrac{R}{r}=\dfrac{\lambda}{\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{R}{\sqrt{z^2+R^2}},$$
where ##r=\sqrt{z^2+R^2}##.
I have done this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just an accident that your answer is close to the right one. To calculate the circulation of the electric field around the ring you will need the field at points on the ring not somewhere on the axis. This field is not directed tangential to the path, And anyway, this integral around the ring (closed path) should be zero. so it will be useless.
You need to calculate the potential by integrating the contributions of each element of the ring to the potential to the given point on the axis. Similar to what you did for the electric field of the ring.
Or, you could use the definitionn of potential based on the integral of the electric field but then you need to integrate from the given pont to infinity and use the right path (and right formula for the field).
 
nasu said:
It's just an accident that your answer is close to the right one. To calculate the circulation of the electric field around the ring you will need the field at points on the ring not somewhere on the axis. This field is not directed tangential to the path, And anyway, this integral around the ring (closed path) should be zero. so it will be useless.
You need to calculate the potential by integrating the contributions of each element of the ring to the potential to the given point on the axis. Similar to what you did for the electric field of the ring.
Or, you could use the definitionn of potential based on the integral of the electric field but then you need to integrate from the given pont to infinity and use the right path (and right formula for the field).
Now I had done this and I would say it's fine. We have a charged ring:

$$V=\int_{\textrm{ring}} dV=\int_{\textrm{ring}} k\dfrac{dq}{r}=\int_{\textrm{ring}} k\dfrac{\lambda dl}{r}=k\dfrac{\lambda}{r}\int_{2\pi R}dl=$$
$$=k\dfrac{\lambda}{r}2\pi R=\dfrac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon_0}\dfrac{\lambda}{r}2\pi R=\dfrac{\lambda}{2\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{R}{\sqrt{z^2+R^2}}$$
 
It looks like you got the right answer. Doesn't it?
 
  • Like
Likes Guillem_dlc
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top