Power in Sun's Core: Comparing 10^26 W to 276 W/m^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter stinsonbr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Power
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the power output in the Sun's core, comparing the estimated 10^26 W to a much lower figure of 276 W/m^3, which some liken to the power density of a compost pile. Participants clarify that the core's power density is influenced by the time it takes for energy to escape, rather than solely by fusion processes. The fusion rate is self-regulated, meaning that even if fusion were to stop, the luminosity would remain relatively stable for millions of years due to gravitational contraction. This leads to a misunderstanding of how fusion and energy escape dynamics interact, with some arguing that fusion's role is more significant than others suggest. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of stellar physics and the misconceptions surrounding fusion power.
  • #31
It appears I will not get an answer to my question, so for the benefit of the OPer, I will answer it myself: if you replace fusion in the Sun by a similar process that releases energy twice as fast at the same temperature and density, it will not have any significant impact on the luminosity of the Sun. This is obvious, is it not, from the well-known fact that the Sun's luminosity did not even change when fusion first initiated.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
In one of Brian Cox's popular science broadcasts, he relates a history related to the sun's modest toaster oven power density. IIRC, he stated when the first estimates of the sun's radiated power were calculated (from the time to melt ice via sunlight on the Earth and the sun's distance was known), the results led some to the (seemingly wacky) guess that the sun was burning something like coal, as the total radiated power was a rough match for a coal fired body of that size. That coal would have been consumed too quickly did not immediately squash the hypothesis, since at the time a ~10,000 year old Sun/Earth was still fashionable.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
24K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K