Power needed to keep conveyor belt running

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the power required to keep a conveyor belt running with sand particles falling onto it. Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy, friction, and the work done on the system, questioning the assumptions made in the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different methods of calculating power, including using kinetic energy changes and forces acting on the system. There are attempts to reconcile differing power values obtained through various equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the role of friction and energy loss. Some suggest focusing on momentum balance rather than energy balance, while others express confusion about the calculations and seek clarification on the assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted complexity in accounting for the internal frictional forces and their impact on energy calculations. Participants are also grappling with the implications of varying velocities of the sand particles as they interact with the conveyor belt.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2018-1-4_14-37-22.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Taking change in the kinetic energy per unit time as power,

P = ## \frac {d W}{dt} = \frac {d K}{dt} = \frac 1 2 \frac { dm} {dt} v^2 = 36.75 ## watt...(1)

## P = \vec F \cdot \vec v = \frac{ dm} {dt} \vec v \cdot \vec v = \frac { dm} {dt} v^2 = 73.5 ## watt...(2)

## dK = \vec F \cdot d \vec r = v^2 dm ## ...(3)

change in the kinetic energy per unit time = ## \frac 1 2 (m + 1.5) v^2 - \frac 1 2 m v^2 = 1.5 ~ \frac 1 2 v^2 ## ...(4)

I am getting two different answers.
[/B]
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-3_14-39-16.png
    upload_2018-1-3_14-39-16.png
    21.6 KB · Views: 464
  • upload_2018-1-4_14-37-22.png
    upload_2018-1-4_14-37-22.png
    10 KB · Views: 1,184
Physics news on Phys.org
Every sand particle doesn't start moving as soon as it falls...but over a short interval it has to overcome friction and attain the velocity...out of 73.5 watt 36.75 goes into kinetic energy and remaining half goes into work against friction
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam and haruspex
Let's say that the system is the sand particles upon the conveyor belt and the conveyor belt .

At time t, the mass of the system is m(t).

Now, the kinetic energy of the system at time t is ## \frac 1 2 m(t) v^2 ##.

the kinetic energy of the system at time t + ## dt ## is ## \frac 1 2 (m(t) + dm)v^2 ##.

Now, the change in the kinetic energy of the system per unit time is ## \frac 1 2 \frac { dm} {dt} v^2 ##. I am supposed to provide this much energy to the system per unit time. So, the required power is ## \frac 1 2 \frac { dm} {dt} v^2 ## = 36.75 W.

Now, the friction force is an internal force. Why should this be considered?
 
Last edited:
Frictional force is internal...but there is always heat loss associated with it...you can't ignore thatMomentum change of the system due to friction will be zero owing to its internal nature but heat loss would have to be considered
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
What is happening is : when the sand particle falls on the conveyor belt, friction force works upon it till its speed becomes equal to the speed of conveyor belt. Work done by the friction force upon the particle is ## \frac 1 2 1.5 v^2 ## .

Now, work done by the friction force upon the system at time t i.e. m(t) per unit second is equal and opposite to that upon the sand particle per unit second. How to show it?

The sand particle contacts n points of the system at time t i.e. m(t) of length dr such that n dr = l the distance traveled by the particle before its speed becomes equal to v. I assume that this process takes 1s time.

The friction force acts upon each of the n points of the system at time t i.e. m(t) till each point move a distance dr in the opposite direction of the friction force.

Thus, the work done by the friction force upon the system at time t i.e. m(t) per unit second is ## W_{cb} = f_{r_{cb}} n dr = - f_{r_{sp}} l = - \frac 1 2 1.5 v^2 ## , where ## f_{r_{cb} }##is the friction force acting upon the system at time t i.e. m(t) and ##f_{r_{sp}}## is the friction force acting upon the sand particle.

Now, (work done by me on the system at time t i.e. m(t) to keep it moving with speed v + work done by friction force on the system at time t i.e. m(t) ) per unit second = ( change in the kinetic energy of the system at time t i.e. m(t) per unit time=0).

change in the kinetic energy of the system at time t i.e. m(t) per unit time=0 as the speed of the system at time t i.e. m(t) remains same.

Required power = (work done by me on the system at time t i.e. m(t) to keep it moving with speed v) per unit second

= - ( work done by friction force on the system at time t i.e. m(t) ) per unit second = ## \frac 1 2 \frac { dm} {dt} v^2 = 36.75 ## watt.
 
Last edited:
Altair Tans said:
Momentum change of the system due to friction will be zero owing to its internal nature but heat loss would have to be considered
Altair Tans said:
Every sand particle doesn't start moving as soon as it falls...but over a short interval it has to overcome friction and attain the velocity...out of 73.5 watt 36.75 goes into kinetic energy and remaining half goes into work against friction
I want to arrive at what you are saying, mathematically, but getting stuck.
 
Pushoam said:
I want to arrive at what you are saying, mathematically, but getting stuck.
Rather than chasing after an energy balance, try chasing the momentum balance. As has been pointed out, the problem with mechanical energy is that it is not conserved -- it can drain into frictional losses.

So... at what rate does momentum have to be delivered to the stream of sand?

Edit: Silly me, you've been down this road in the OP
 
Last edited:
Pushoam said:

## P = \vec F \cdot \vec v = \frac{ dm} {dt} \vec v \cdot \vec v = \frac { dm} {dt} v^2 = 73.5 ## watt...(2)

I see you replace F with dm/dt * v

The velocity isn't constant, it goes from 0 to v so the average is 0.5v. This looks to be where the factor of 2 error is coming in.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K