Power screw horizontal applicaion FBD

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of free body diagrams (FBD) for power screws in horizontal motion, contrasting with typical vertical applications. Key points include the necessity of breaking down the Normal force into components when summing forces, particularly in dynamic scenarios where the screw is in motion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using F=ma for moving systems and acknowledges that the coefficient of friction varies between static and dynamic conditions. Participants clarify that both methods of force summation are valid, depending on the axis orientation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of free body diagrams (FBD)
  • Knowledge of static vs. dynamic friction coefficients
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion, particularly F=ma
  • Basic principles of torque in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of free body diagrams in mechanical engineering contexts
  • Learn about the differences between static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Explore torque calculations in horizontal motion applications
  • Research the impact of axis orientation on force summation in FBDs
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in the analysis of power screws and their applications in horizontal motion.

M.E. Tom
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have been trying to set up a free body diagram for a power screw in a horizontal application.
Every example I find they are using a power screw to lift or lower a load not move it left to right.

I have attached the example from the textbook, along with my work so far.

Looking at the textbook example why do they break the Normal force into components when summing forces? In most physics textbooks the Normal force is left intact and other forces, such at weight, are broken down.

Second, on the work2.pdf when I am summing forces for the left traverse condition, I get the Force of friction in the x equal to the negative x component of the normal force. Is this right?

Third, should there be a thrust force causing the nut to move horizontally?
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
M.E. Tom said:
Looking at the textbook example why do they break the Normal force into components when summing forces? In most physics textbooks the Normal force is left intact and other forces, such at weight, are broken down.

Second, on the work2.pdf when I am summing forces for the left traverse condition, I get the Force of friction in the x equal to the negative x component of the normal force. Is this right?

Both methods are valid. It doesn't matter where your axis is located as long as you keep using it throughout the problem. If weight was the only force acting in that example then you would need to use less trig by placing one axis along the inclined plane. That way you wouldn't need to break the normal and friction forces into components.

Your answer is right, but it only works when the screw is not moving. If it was moving you would need set F=ma instead of F=0. Remember that the coefficient of friction is different when it is moving than when it is static.
 
Skrambles said:
Both methods are valid. It doesn't matter where your axis is located as long as you keep using it throughout the problem. If weight was the only force acting in that example then you would need to use less trig by placing one axis along the inclined plane. That way you wouldn't need to break the normal and friction forces into components.

That is what I thought.

Your answer is right, but it only works when the screw is not moving. If it was moving you would need set F=ma instead of F=0. Remember that the coefficient of friction is different when it is moving than when it is static.

Ok, this makes perfect sense. I drew the FBD not thinking about it moving and then confused myself when summing forces.

When it is moving then "P" will have to provide both the Torque and the Acceleration force. How would you draw that resultant force?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K