Power Series: Question about constants

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a second-order differential equation (DE) and the application of power series solutions. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the number of arbitrary constants resulting from their solution process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the role of arbitrary constants in their power series solution, questioning whether both a0 and a1 should be defined as arbitrary. Some participants suggest that two arbitrary constants are indeed expected for a second-order DE and discuss the implications of initial conditions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's concerns, providing insights about the expected number of arbitrary constants and discussing potential alternative methods for solving the equation. There is an indication of productive exploration of different approaches without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a desire for input on the details of series solutions and expresses interest in alternative methods for solving the DE, indicating a broader context of inquiry beyond the immediate power series question.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



So I have attached the problem in image:

Pr and A are just numbers (constants) that are given. I solved the equation by power series solution. However, I am just confused because it is a second order DE but I only have one arbitrary constant of integration ao. I am not sure where I went wrong? Should I have defined BOTH a0 and a1 to be arbitrary? I never got the hang of the little details with series solutions; perhaps I can get some input on this.

Thanks :smile:

PowerSeries.jpg


Also, I would be interested to hear any other ideas about ways to solve this equation, but my power series question is my main concern.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't look very closely, but it looks like you're on the right track. Since your equation is second order, you will have two arbitrary constants, which in your case are a0 and a3. Problems like this have two initial conditions y(x0) = y0, and y'(x0) = y1. Since your series is a Maclaurin series, x0 = 0.
 
Look at the step where you change the index so it starts at n = -2. The other two sums start at n = 0 so they can't be grouped in the sum at that step. Furthermore, n = -1 and n = -2 don't give anything in the first sum and n= 0 doesn't give anything in the second. So write that step:

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty(n+1)(n+2)a_{n+2}x^n+A\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}na_nx^n<br /> -A\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n[/tex]

Now n = 0 will give a2 in terms of a0 and n = 1 will give a3 in terms of a1, with a0 and a1 arbitrary.
 
Sweet! I went through it again and got a0 and a1 as my arbitrary constants. Out of curiosity, anyone see another way to solve this? I was thinking that if we divide through by y' we would have:

y"/y' + Ax - Ay/y' = 0

Now the first term can be written ln[y']'. If I could write the last term in a similar fashion (i.e. as a derivative), I could integrate directly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K