Why Does \( e^{\frac{15i\pi}{2}} \) Simplify to \( e^{\frac{3i\pi}{2}} \)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the simplification of \( e^{\frac{15i\pi}{2}} \) to \( e^{\frac{3i\pi}{2}} \) in the context of complex numbers. The participants confirm that both expressions are equivalent due to the periodic nature of the exponential function in the complex plane. The correct approach involves using De Moivre's Theorem, where \( z = -1 + i \) leads to \( z^{10} = 32e^{i(15\pi/2)} \), which simplifies to \( 32e^{i(3\pi/2)} \) by reducing the angle to fall within the principal argument range. The discussion emphasizes the importance of converting angles to their equivalent values within the range of \( 0 < \theta < 2\pi \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation in polar form
  • Familiarity with De Moivre's Theorem
  • Knowledge of the periodic properties of the exponential function in the complex plane
  • Ability to convert angles to their principal values
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of De Moivre's Theorem in complex number calculations
  • Learn about the periodicity of the complex exponential function
  • Explore the concept of principal arguments in complex analysis
  • Practice simplifying complex exponentials with various angles
USEFUL FOR

Students studying complex analysis, mathematicians working with exponential functions, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of polar coordinates in the context of complex numbers.

Phyisab****
Messages
584
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Obtain z^10 for z=-1+i


Homework Equations



z=re^i(theta)


The Attempt at a Solution



Theta is 3pi/4. So z^10 = 32e^i(15pi/2).

The answer in my book is 32e^i(3pi/2) but I'm pretty sure that's wrong, can anyone confirm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes but e^{\frac{15 i \pi}{2}} = e^{\frac{12 i \pi}{2}} \cdot e^{\frac{3 i \pi}{2}}

does that help?
 
z = -1 + i = sqrt(2) cis(3/4 pi)

z^10 = 2^5 cis (10 x 3/4 pi) {De Moivre's Theorem}
= 32 cis (15/2 pi)
= -32i
 
So I was right? Why did the answer appear in the book that way? Or is it wrong?
 
Both the book and your answer is right -
though technically the answers should be 32e^-i(1/2pi).

remember, the range of principal argument is 0 < theta < pi (above the x-axis) &
-pi < theta < 0 (below the x-axis). so whenever you get a value beyond these ranges you have to convert your large value into an equivalent but smaller value within the range.

So you start at the line to the right of the origin of the x-axis (which is theta = 0). one revolution around all the quadrants back to the start is 2 pi. you keep on going until you finish up to 15/2 pi. you should end up at the line to the bottom of the origin of the y-axis. that is 3/2 pi.
 
latentcorpse said:
yes but e^{\frac{15 i \pi}{2}} = e^{\frac{12 i \pi}{2}} \cdot e^{\frac{3 i \pi}{2}}

does that help?

Phyisab**** said:
So I was right? Why did the answer appear in the book that way? Or is it wrong?
The point is that 12 i \pi= 6 (2 i \pi) so that e^{12 i\pi}= (e^{2 i\pi})^6= 1.

e^{15 i \pi}= e^{3 i\pi} but it is best always to write the argument between 0 and 2\pi.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K