Preaching Politics from the Pulpit

  • News
  • Thread starter Evo
  • Start date
  • #1
Evo
Mentor
23,106
2,459

Main Question or Discussion Point

This isn't about Obama. It's about the flagrant abuse of authority of preachers preaching politics to their followers. People that go to church are pretty much taught since a small child that a member of the clergy is always to be trusted, if you have a problem, are in trouble, in need of direction, you should talk to your pastor, priest, rabbi, etc... These people have captive audiences that will believe to some degree everything they say.

I have nothing against a religious figure talking about religion. I absolutely have a problem when they overstep their bounds and start preaching politics. I personally believe that this should not be allowed at all.

This is the latest preacher that should have kept his mouth shut.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080530/ap_on_el_pr/obama_pfleger [Broken]

CHICAGO - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Thursday that he was "deeply disappointed" by a supporter's sermon at his church that mocked Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The Rev. Michael Pfleger, a Chicago activist, also apologized for last Sunday's sermon at Obama's church, in which he said Clinton's eyes welled with tears before the New Hampshire primary because she felt "entitled" to the Democratic nomination and because "there's a black man stealing my show."

In video circulating on the Internet, Pfleger said the former first lady expected to win the nomination before Obama's sudden popularity.

"She just always thought that, 'This is mine. I'm Bill's wife. I'm white.' ... And then, out of nowhere, came 'Hey, I'm Barack Obama." And she said, 'Oh damn, where did you come from? I'm white. I'm entitled. There's a black man stealing my show,'" Pfleger said at Trinity United Church of Christ.

He then went on to parody Clinton, sobbing and wiping his face with a handkerchief.

"She wasn't the only one crying," he said. "There was a whole lot of white people crying."
This got on the news because it was at Obama's Church. This kind of thing seems to be going on in quite a few churches, just gauging from the churchgoers in my office.

How do you feel about preachers preaching politics?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
BobG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
185
80
I think atheists can take hope that they'll get an atheist candidate for President sooner than they think. Candidates will start to claim they're atheists just to avoid embarrassment.
 
  • #3
drankin
I think preachers should be able to say anything they damn well please. It's called freedom of speech. When the government starts telling preachers what they can say and cannot say we are in trouble.

People need to take responsibility for who they trust to teach them morals and values. Not the government or whomever you were thinking would prevent a preacher from speaking his mind, Evo.
 
  • #4
420
0
This isn't about Obama. It's about the flagrant abuse of authority of preachers preaching politics to their followers. People that go to church are pretty much taught since a small child that a member of the clergy is always to be trusted, if you have a problem, are in trouble, in need of direction, you should talk to your pastor, priest, rabbi, etc... These people have captive audiences that will believe to some degree everything they say.

I have nothing against a religious figure talking about religion. I absolutely have a problem when they overstep their bounds and start preaching politics. I personally believe that this should not be allowed at all.

This is the latest preacher that should have kept his mouth shut.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080530/ap_on_el_pr/obama_pfleger [Broken]

This got on the news because it was at Obama's Church. This kind of thing seems to be going on in quite a few churches, just gauging from the churchgoers in my office.

How do you feel about preachers preaching politics?

I agree with you , but be realistic: You cannot control the thoughts of each individual has about their preacher. They've are going to have to make up their own minds about whether are not all their values are based on what they're preacher says. Not all clergy men who talk about politics are bad . Martin Luther King being a famous example. If he did not talk about human rights in his church and motivate people to make a social change, Jim Crow laws would still be in existence.

Sadly though, there are probably a heck of a lot more Jerry falwell's than Martin Luther Kings. Furthermore, I don't think you should attack the preacher so much. Many of these clergymen would not have the political power they've have if not fore the mindless sheep that continue support these kinds of people. What is a head without its body? Blame the sheep , not the sheperd .

The root of the problem is that a lot of people failed to think rationally about what comes out of their preacher's mouths and mindlessly eats whatever their preacher feeds them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
23,843
6,290
If political action is part of their religious beliefs, I have no problem with that. Society - via the state - shouldn't attempt to regulate what is preached in a church.

However, the price the church should pay is loss of its 501(c)(3) status.
 
  • #6
drankin
If political action is part of their religious beliefs, I have no problem with that. Society - via the state - shouldn't attempt to regulate what is preached in a church.

However, the price the church should pay is loss of its 501(c)(3) status.
I can agree to this to some extent. If a preacher has an opinion that is political in nature then he should be able to voice it without consequence. But what of all the other non-profit organizations that are political in nature, should those go without the tax status?

Edit by Evo - I removed your reference to Jesus. This is about religions pushing political views. This is not about your favorite religion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Evo
Mentor
23,106
2,459
I think preachers should be able to say anything they damn well please. It's called freedom of speech. When the government starts telling preachers what they can say and cannot say we are in trouble.

People need to take responsibility for who they trust to teach them morals and values. Not the government or whomever you were thinking would prevent a preacher from speaking his mind, Evo.
I disagree. There is supposed to be a separation of church and state in this country. While it is usually used to protect religion from Government, religion shouldn't be a part of politics.

http://pewforum.org/religion-politics/
 
  • #8
drankin
I disagree. There is supposed to be a separation of church and state in this country. While it is usually used to protect religion from Government, religion shouldn't be a part of politics.

http://pewforum.org/religion-politics/
It's not to prevent religion from having political views it's to prevent GOVERNMENT FROM BEING RELIGIOUS. That's a compete perversion of the "seperation of church and state".
 
  • #9
Evo
Mentor
23,106
2,459
It's not to prevent religion from having political views it's to prevent GOVERNMENT FROM BEING RELIGIOUS. That's a compete perversion of the "seperation of church and state".
Did you read what I said?

Also, since you say "it's to prevent government from being religious" you still think it's right for religious groups to try to make religion an inseparable part of politics?
 
  • #10
420
0
I disagree. There is supposed to be a separation of church and state in this country. While it is usually used to protect religion from Government, religion shouldn't be a part of politics.

http://pewforum.org/religion-politics/
Why can't preachers expressed their political beliefs? They are citizens of this country just like everyone else. The consititution does not (or should not)allow laws to made based on religious beliefs. That is the essense seperation of church and state.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Evo
Mentor
23,106
2,459
Why can't preachers expressed their political beliefs? They are citizens of this country just like everyone else.
Of course they can express their beliefs, outside of their official capacity which is to teach the word of God. When they abuse their position within the church to push their own personal political agendas, they've gone too far, IMHO.

Go back to my OP
I have nothing against a religious figure talking about religion. I absolutely have a problem when they overstep their bounds and start preaching politics. I personally believe that this should not be allowed at all.
I feel that if the government should stay out of religion, religion should stay out of Government. I personally feel that there is way too much religious interference and control over our politicians.
 
  • #12
drankin
Did you read what I said?

Also, since you say "it's to prevent government from being religious" you still think it's right for religious groups to try to make religion an inseparable part of politics?
Why shouldn't religous groups be part of politics? There is a myriad of groups that are part of politics. Why single out religous groups as opposed to environmental groups, for example? That's straight communism.
 
  • #13
Evo
Mentor
23,106
2,459
Why shouldn't religous groups be part of politics? There is a myriad of groups that are part of politics. Why single out religous groups as opposed to environmental groups, for example? That's straight communism.
If churches want to lose their privileged status and become a lobbying group, then that's different. They want their cake and eat it too.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
4,464
65
... if the government should stay out of religion, religion should stay out of Government...
100 Points. We have a long way to go.
 
  • #15
drankin
If churches want to lose their priveledged status and become a lobbying group, then that's different. They want their cake and eat it too.
Think of all the non-profit NON-RELIGIOUS organizations that have political agendas. Got to strip them too.

Just because you don't like religion doesn't mean those who do should lose their right to free speech when it involves politics. Don't you see what that is?
 
  • #16
299
0
I think preachers should be able to say anything they damn well please. It's called freedom of speech. When the government starts telling preachers what they can say and cannot say we are in trouble.
I disagree. Preachers/reverends/ministers (whatever you call them) have a lot of sway with their followers or "flock" and can influence them immensely...I do not think it's appropriate for people in these positions to propagate or openly support a specific political candidate, party or ideal.

Apartheid is a classic example of why religion and politics shouldn't be mixed.
 
  • #17
299
0
Think of all the non-profit NON-RELIGIOUS organizations that have political agendas. Got to strip them too.

Just because you don't like religion doesn't mean those who do should lose their right to free speech when it involves politics. Don't you see what that is?
Green Peace can't sabotage your chance at an afterlife if you decide to go against what they preach...You can't compare the two...Religious organisations hold a lot more power over their followers...
 
  • #18
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,213
174
Churches have every right to speak out on issues of morality and ethics, but when they start pushing for a particular candidate or degrading others, then they should lose their tax exempt status.
 
  • #19
299
0
Churches have every right to speak out on issues of morality and ethics, but when they start pushing for a particular candidate or degrading others, then they should lose their tax exempt status.
Well-said.
 
  • #20
drankin
Green Peace can't sabotage your chance at an afterlife if you decide to go against what they preach...You can't compare the two...Religious organisations hold a lot more power over their followers...
But religion is not a recognized political organization. It holds no real power in itself. What you guys are suggesting is censoring belief systems. That = communism.

Fortunately, as long as the Constitution is the basis of our government, we won't see this kind of thing happen.
 
  • #21
420
0
If churches want to lose their privileged status and become a lobbying group, then that's different. They want their cake and eat it too.
if you are inferring that are exempted from paying taxes, then yes I do agree with you. Churches should be taxed because a preacher receives a salary just like every other profession. We walk different paths when you say that the government should regulate what a preacher says if he is considered to have to much power. That facism in its sleepy form.
 
  • #22
drankin
if you are inferring that are exempted from paying taxes, then yes I do agree with you. Churches should be taxed because a preacher receives a salary just like every other profession. We walk different paths when you say that the government should regulate what a preacher says if he is considered to have to much power. That facism in its sleepy form.
From what you are saying all non-profit organizations should be taxed. Because most everyone working in those organizations are getting paychecks.
 
  • #23
299
0
It holds no real power in itself.
:bugeye:

What you guys are suggesting is censoring belief systems.
No-one said anything about censoring people's beliefs. I have no issues with people following whatever philosophy or doctrine they please. My problem is that preachers, like teachers, are in positions of authority and can abuse this power very easily since their congregations already perceive them as people somehow "closer to divinity than your average person" and could interpret their (the preachers) personal opinions as that of whichever deity they represent. Nothing has as much power over the religious as their religions...
 
  • #24
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,051
17
In my opinion, organized religion is a government protected scam, similar to the (tax exempt) California State Homeopathic Medical Society, but much bigger and much more influential.
 
  • #25
drankin
:bugeye:



No-one said anything about censoring people's beliefs. I have no issues with people following whatever philosophy or doctrine they please. My problem is that preachers, like teachers, are in positions of authority and can abuse this power very easily since their congregations already perceive them as people somehow closer to divinity than the norm and could interpret their personal opinions as that of whichever deity they represent. Nothing has as much power over the religious as their religions...
I agree they have a powerful influence. But they are not a government organization. What is being suggested here is government regulation of non-government organizations. As far as tax status, that's a different topic with it's own bag of gotchas, I don't care if churches are taxed or not. But for government to regulate what an organization, religious or otherwise, speaks to it's members is completely un-constitutional. Completely communistic.
 

Related Threads for: Preaching Politics from the Pulpit

  • Last Post
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
799
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Top