Predicting a diffraction pattern without the limiting assumption

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around predicting diffraction patterns without the common assumption that L (distance to the screen) is much greater than d (slit separation) and lambda (wavelength). The distinction is made between Fraunhofer diffraction, which relies on this assumption, and Fresnel diffraction, which applies when the assumption does not hold. The original poster seeks clarification on how to approach diffraction patterns without the limiting assumption, as this was not covered in their coursework. The conversation highlights the need for understanding both types of diffraction to fully grasp wave optics. Overall, the topic emphasizes the importance of exploring diffraction patterns beyond traditional assumptions.
cosgriffc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I have a relatively simple question. I have learned very recently about wave optics and the resulting diffraction patterns. The experiment by Thomas Young was used to explain the topic and the equations were solved with the assumption that L >> d >> lambda. I was curious how one would determine a pattern without this assumption as it was never discussed in class and all the pages I find online explain the equations using this assumption.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cosgriffc, Diffraction using the assumption L >> d is called Fraunhofer diffraction. Otherwise without this assumption its called Fresnel diffraction.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K