Predicting a diffraction pattern without the limiting assumption

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between Fraunhofer and Fresnel diffraction patterns in wave optics. Fraunhofer diffraction occurs under the assumption that the distance from the aperture to the observation screen (L) is much greater than the aperture width (d) and the wavelength (lambda). In contrast, Fresnel diffraction applies when this assumption does not hold, allowing for the analysis of diffraction patterns in closer proximity to the aperture. Understanding these two types of diffraction is crucial for accurately predicting diffraction patterns in various experimental setups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Wave optics fundamentals
  • Understanding of diffraction phenomena
  • Knowledge of the parameters L, d, and lambda
  • Familiarity with mathematical modeling of light behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of Fresnel diffraction patterns
  • Explore practical applications of Fresnel diffraction in optical systems
  • Learn about the experimental setups for observing both Fraunhofer and Fresnel diffraction
  • Investigate the limitations and assumptions in wave optics experiments
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, optical engineers, and anyone interested in advanced wave optics and diffraction analysis.

cosgriffc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I have a relatively simple question. I have learned very recently about wave optics and the resulting diffraction patterns. The experiment by Thomas Young was used to explain the topic and the equations were solved with the assumption that L >> d >> lambda. I was curious how one would determine a pattern without this assumption as it was never discussed in class and all the pages I find online explain the equations using this assumption.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cosgriffc, Diffraction using the assumption L >> d is called Fraunhofer diffraction. Otherwise without this assumption its called Fresnel diffraction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K