Preferred direction in time?

In summary: Feynman's example of entropy is a good illustration of how our physical laws work, but it's not an illustration of how the universe prefers one direction over another.In summary, the Michelson-Morley showed that there is no preferred direction in space, but that the speed of light is the same regardless of the state of motion of the interferometer. There is no preferred direction in time in SR, but it is important to note that the future and the past are distinct, even if neither is preferred.
  • #1
99
2
I had a question about michelson morley and about sr. Did michelson morley show that there is no preferred direction in space only? Is there a preferred direction in time? Seems like in sr, there is no preferred frame of reference, but does this mean that there is no preferred direction in time? Does time always flow forward? And if so, does this mean that there is a preferred direction in time? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
idea2000 said:
Did michelson morley show that there is no preferred direction in space only?

The Michelson-Morley did not show that there is not a preferred direction in space. It showed that the speed of light is the same regardless of the state of motion of the interferometer.
 
  • #3
idea2000 said:
Is there a preferred direction in time?

There isn't in any of our fundamental theories (with the possible exception of some aspects of weak interactions, but those don't have anything to do with our everyday experience). However, there does appear to be in our experience. Where the apparent "arrow of time" in our experience comes from is an open question. One common hypothesis is that it comes from our universe having a very special set of initial conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #4
idea2000 said:
Is there a preferred direction in time? Seems like in sr, there is no preferred frame of reference, but does this mean that there is no preferred direction in time?
There is no preferred direction in time in SR, but it is important to note that the future and the past are distinct, even if neither is preferred.

If you consider all of the events at a fixed spacetime interval from the origin, that set of events forms a hyperboloid. For spacelike intervals it is a hyperboloid of one sheet, meaning that you can smoothly rotate “east” into “west”.

In contrast, for timelike intervals it is a hyperboloid of two sheets, so you cannot smoothly rotate “future” into “past”. Future-directed timelike vectors are distinct from past-directed ones.
 
  • Like
Likes Pencilvester
  • #5
Would having a preferred direction in time in sr mess up the theory in any way? Would sr still be consistent and viable even if there was a preferred direction in time? or in space?
 
  • #6
idea2000 said:
Would having a preferred direction in time in sr mess up the theory in any way?

This was already answered.

Dale said:
There is no preferred direction in time in SR
 
  • #7
If you reversed time, this wouldn't reverse entropy?
 
  • #8
Yes, but that probably doesn't mean what you think it means. Feynman, in his Caltech lecture on entropy, gives an example of a mixture of ink and water unmixing itself spontaneously. There's nothing physically wrong with that happening, it's just highly improbable. As Peter said in post #3, none of our physical laws have a preferred direction in time. It's just that the universe at one end of time seems to have been in a highly improbable state.
 

Suggested for: Preferred direction in time?

Replies
105
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
248
Replies
8
Views
789
Replies
45
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
369
Replies
4
Views
282
Replies
22
Views
746
Replies
53
Views
3K
Replies
58
Views
2K
Back
Top