Prep for Algebra Comprehensive Exam #2

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BSMSMSTMSPHD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Exam
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that an integral domain R, which is finite-dimensional as a vector space over a subring F, is a field. Participants explore various approaches to the proof, including linear dependence and properties of maximal ideals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes to show that every non-zero element in R is a unit by demonstrating linear dependence among a specific set of powers of an element r.
  • Another participant suggests an alternative approach using the theorem that states R is a field if and only if its maximal ideal is {0}.
  • A challenge is raised regarding the assumption that all coefficients in the linear dependence relation are non-zero, questioning the validity of the proof.
  • A subsequent reply acknowledges the oversight and suggests a method to identify the first non-zero coefficient to refine the argument.
  • Another participant briefly asserts that injective linear maps of finite-dimensional spaces are surjective, implying a conclusion without further elaboration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the initial proof and the assumptions made regarding coefficients in the linear dependence relation. The discussion remains unresolved as participants explore various approaches and corrections.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions about coefficients in the linear dependence relation, as well as the dependence on definitions of maximal ideals and properties of integral domains.

BSMSMSTMSPHD
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
2. Let [tex]R[/tex] be an integral domain containing [tex]F[/tex] as a subring. Suppose that [tex]R[/tex] is finite-dimensional when viewed as a vector space over [tex]F[/tex]. Prove that [tex]R[/tex] is a field.

SOLUTION

I will show that [tex]\forall \ r \in R, (r \neq 0), r[/tex] is a unit. Equivalently, [tex]\forall \ r \in R, (r \neq 0), \exists \ s \in R, (s \neq 0),[/tex] such that [tex] rs = sr = 1[/tex].

Suppose [tex]dim_{F}(R)=n[/tex] and consider the subset [tex]\{ 1, r, r^2, r^3, ..., r^n, r^{n+1} \}[/tex]. This set is linearly dependent over [tex]F[/tex]. That is, [tex]\exists \ a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n+1} \in F - \{ 0 \}[/tex] such that:

[tex]a_0(1) + a_1(r) + a_2(r^2) + ... + a_n(r^n) + a_{n+1}(r^{n+1}) = 0[/tex]

Then, [tex]a_1(r) + a_2(r^2) + ... + a_n(r^n) + a_{n+1}(r^{n+1}) = -a_0[/tex]

Since [tex]F[/tex] is a field, and [tex]a_0 \neq 0[/tex], it follows that [tex]a_0[/tex] must be a unit. So, we can divide the last equation by [tex]-a_0[/tex] producing:

[tex]- \frac{a_1}{a_0}(r) - \frac{a_2}{a_0}(r^2) - ... - \frac{a_n}{a_0}(r^n) - \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_0}(r^{n+1}) = 1[/tex][tex]r(- \frac{a_1}{a_0} - \frac{a_2}{a_0}(r) - ... - \frac{a_n}{a_0}(r^{n-1}) - \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_0}(r^n)) = 1[/tex]Call the expression in the parentheses [tex]s[/tex]. We have shown that [tex]rs=1[/tex]. Additionally, [tex]s \neq 0[/tex] since [tex]R[/tex] in n-dimensional over [tex]F[/tex]. Finally, since [tex]R[/tex] is an integral domain, [tex]rs = sr = 1[/tex].

Therefore, every element in [tex]R[/tex] is a unit, and so [tex]R[/tex] must be a field.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Another approach is to show the maximal ideal of [tex]R[/tex] is [tex]\{ 0\}[/tex]. But this is not shorter than what you did.

By using the theorem.

Theorem: Let [tex]R[/tex] be a commutative unitary ring. [tex]R[/tex] is a field if and only if its maximal ideal is [tex]\{ 0 \}[/tex].
 
There's a problem with your proof: we don't know that a_0 [itex]\neq[/itex] 0. Linear dependence doesn't imply that all the a_i's are nonzero - it implies that they're not all zero, leaving the possibility of some being zero as long as we have at least one nonzero a_j.
 
Ah yes, you are right. I shouldn't have written that all of the coefficients were not zero. I suspect that we can say [tex]a_0 \neq 0[/tex] based on the second line:

[tex]a_1(r) + a_2(r^2) + ... + a_n(r^n) + a_{n+1}(r^{n+1}) = -a_0[/tex]

Help?
 
One way you can overcome this is by letting j be the first index for which a_j [itex]\neq[/itex] 0. Your expression will become:

[tex]a_j r^j + a_{j+1} r^{j+1} + \cdots + a_{n+1} r^{n+1} = 0[/tex]

Then you can pull out r^j:

[tex]r^j \left(a_j + a_{j+1} r + \cdots + a_{n+1} r^{n+1-j}\right) = 0[/tex]

Now your previous argument, together with the fact that R is an integral domain, can be used to finish things off.
 
injective linear maps of finite dimensional spaces are surjective. done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K