Pressure under the ice of Europa?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GTOM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Europa Ice Pressure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the water pressure beneath the ice of Europa, one of Jupiter's moons, and the feasibility of exploring this environment with machines or structures. Participants explore various aspects including the ice thickness, pressure calculations, and the challenges of penetrating the ice layer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the potential water pressure under Europa's ice and whether it could be manageable for machines.
  • Another participant asks for the surface gravity of Europa and the specific depth of interest, suggesting the need for a formula to calculate pressure based on depth.
  • It is noted that scientists estimate Europa's ice shell thickness to be between 10 to 15 miles (15 to 25 kilometers).
  • Participants discuss the depth capabilities of submarines, referencing the Los Angeles class submarine and suggesting it could potentially operate at depths of 2,160 meters on Europa.
  • There is a question about whether the ice layer could support its own weight without the pressure from the water below, comparing it to a solid ball with varying internal pressures.
  • Concerns are raised about the challenges of breaking through the ice, with one participant suggesting mechanical and thermal methods for penetration.
  • Another participant proposes the idea of a submarine that could test the concept by diving through Antarctic ice to Lake Vostok before attempting to reach Europa, questioning the thermal conductivity of ice at extreme temperatures.
  • Discussion includes the idea that submersibles may not need to worry about pressure if gas pockets are removed from their construction, allowing for deeper exploration.
  • It is suggested that a combination of drilling and heating may be the most effective method for penetrating the ice layer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the feasibility of exploring beneath Europa's ice, with no clear consensus on the best methods or the implications of pressure and ice thickness. Multiple competing views remain regarding the challenges and potential solutions for exploration.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the ice thickness, the specific conditions under which exploration would occur, and the technical capabilities of proposed machines or structures. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical or physical challenges presented.

GTOM
Messages
982
Reaction score
68
What could be the water pressure under the ice of Europe moon?
Could it be toleratable for not super expensive machines, structures?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What is the surface gravity of Europa? What depth are you interested in? Do you know the formula for pressure as a function of depth?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, Vanadium 50, BillTre and 1 other person
0.134g. A vessel should be able to go 7.5 times as deep. A Los Angeles class submarine uses 'bout 290 meters, Some on Europa it could sink to 2,160m. I believe they are capable of more than the official operating depths.

You need a rocket that can launch a 6000 ton payload to Jupiter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
So there is no way the ice layer could hold it is own weight without pressure the water below? Like a solid ball that can have either 1 atm or 0.1 atm pressure inside.
 
stefan r said:
0.134g. A vessel should be able to go 7.5 times as deep. A Los Angeles class submarine uses 'bout 290 meters, Some on Europa it could sink to 2,160m. I believe they are capable of more than the official operating depths.

You need a rocket that can launch a 6000 ton payload to Jupiter.
Manned submarines that dove to Titanic were under 20 t. Unmanned submarines even lighter, but could not find numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stefan r
I guess there's the small matter of breaking through the ice
 
SimplePrimate said:
I guess there's the small matter of breaking through the ice
At the temperatures of Europa, yes, mechanical breaking would take complex and irreplaceable moving parts.
How about thermal breaking - a submarine that, for a test, dives through Antarctic ice sheet to Lake Vostok, and then to Europa? How conductive of heat is ice at -60 Celsius or under -100, and how much thermal power output (electrical power is not required for that purpose!) does a submarine 1 m across need to keep its surface just above 0 Celsius inside ice at -100 Celsius?
 
snorkack said:
At the temperatures of Europa, yes, mechanical breaking would take complex and irreplaceable moving parts.
How about thermal breaking - a submarine that, for a test, dives through Antarctic ice sheet to Lake Vostok, and then to Europa? How conductive of heat is ice at -60 Celsius or under -100, and how much thermal power output (electrical power is not required for that purpose!) does a submarine 1 m across need to keep its surface just above 0 Celsius inside ice at -100 Celsius?

I hope that's possible and actually gets done in my lifetime (not so keen on punching that hole in Antarctica though). I'd be interested to so see the maths on this. Maybe the thermal output of a small fission reactor might do it. I dunno.
 
  • #10
Submersibles only need to really concern themselves with pressure when they contain pockets of gas. Remove the gas pockets (usually required when stuffing a submersible with humans, as live humans have this annoying habit of breathing).

So if we can remove all gas pockets from the materials the submersible is constructed of, "we" (with robots) could explore to extraordinary depths. Solids are remarkably resistant to pressure.

To penetrate the ice, a combination of drilling and heating may be the most successful.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GTOM

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K