MHB Primitive Elements and Free Modules .... ....

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding Proposition 4.3.14 from Paul E. Bland's "Rings and Their Modules," specifically regarding the proof that a certain set forms a basis for a free module. The key point is that if a primitive element \( x \) is expressed in terms of a basis of a module \( M \), and if \( M \) has a basis under the induction hypothesis, then the set including \( x \) and the basis of \( M \) can be extended to form a basis for the free module \( F \). This is established by showing that \( F \) can be decomposed into \( M \) and another component, allowing for the inclusion of \( x \) in the basis. The clarification of the definition of a primitive element is also deemed helpful for understanding the proof.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.3: Modules Over Principal Ideal Domains ... and I need some help in order to fully understand the proof of Proposition 4.3.14 ... ...

Proposition 4.3.14 reads as follows:View attachment 8318
View attachment 8319
In the above proof by Bland we read the following:

" ... ... The induction hypothesis gives a basis $$\{ x, x'_2, \ ... \ ... \ x'_{n -1} \}$$ of $$M$$ and it follows that $$\{ x, x'_2, \ ... \ ... \ x'_{n - 1}, x'_n \}$$ is a basis of $$F$$ that contains $$x$$. ... ... "My question is as follows:

Why/how exactly does it follow that $$\{ x, x'_2, \ ... \ ... \ x'_{n - 1}, x'_n \}$$ is a basis of $$F$$ that contains $$x$$. ... ... Help will be appreciated ...

Peter==============================================================

It may help MHB members reading this post to have access to Bland's definition of 'primitive element of a module' ... especially as it seems to me that the definition is a bit unusual ... so I am providing the same as follows:


View attachment 8322

Hope that helps ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
$F$ is a free module, $rank(F) = n$, $x$ is a primitive element of $F$, and suppose the induction hypothesis is true for free modules with $rank < n$

If $\{ x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_n \}$ is a basis for $F$ ($rank(F) = n$)

then $x = x_1 a_1 + x_2 a_2 + \cdots + x_n a_n$ for some $a_i \in R$, $i=1, 2, \cdots, n$

Suppose $a_n = 0$

Then $x \in M = x_1R \oplus x_2R \oplus \cdots \oplus x_{n-1}R$ (definition)

Notice that $F = M \oplus x_nR$

$M$ is a free module and $rank(M) = n-1 < n$

By the induction hypothesis, $M$ has a basis $\{ x, x’_2, \cdots, x’_{n-1} \}$, containing $x$

Thus $M = xR \oplus x’_2R \oplus \cdots \oplus x’_{n-1}R$

and $F = xR \oplus x’_2R \oplus \cdots \oplus x’_{n-1}R \oplus x_nR$

Thus $\{ x, x’_2, \cdots, x’_{n-1}, x_n \}$ is a basis of $F$ that contains $x$
 
steenis said:
$F$ is a free module, $rank(F) = n$, $x$ is a primitive element of $F$, and suppose the induction hypothesis is true for free modules with $rank < n$

If $\{ x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_n \}$ is a basis for $F$ ($rank(F) = n$)

then $x = x_1 a_1 + x_2 a_2 + \cdots + x_n a_n$ for some $a_i \in R$, $i=1, 2, \cdots, n$

Suppose $a_n = 0$

Then $x \in M = x_1R \oplus x_2R \oplus \cdots \oplus x_{n-1}R$ (definition)

Notice that $F = M \oplus x_nR$

$M$ is a free module and $rank(M) = n-1 < n$

By the induction hypothesis, $M$ has a basis $\{ x, x’_2, \cdots, x’_{n-1} \}$, containing $x$

Thus $M = xR \oplus x’_2R \oplus \cdots \oplus x’_{n-1}R$

and $F = xR \oplus x’_2R \oplus \cdots \oplus x’_{n-1}R \oplus x_nR$

Thus $\{ x, x’_2, \cdots, x’_{n-1}, x_n \}$ is a basis of $F$ that contains $x$

Thanks Steenis ...

Appreciate your help ...

Peter
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K