Principal Difference between electrostatic potntial and gravitational

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The principal difference between electrostatic potential and gravitational potential lies in their respective fields and the effects of acceleration on these potentials. While both potentials can be described as scalar quantities related to energy per particle, the electromagnetic case introduces a magnetic field upon acceleration, resulting in two interacting force fields: electric and magnetic. In contrast, gravitational fields do not exhibit a similar behavior, lacking an equivalent magnetic counterpart. The electromagnetic field is characterized as a vector field, while the gravitational field is described as a tensor field, highlighting the fundamental differences in their theoretical frameworks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scalar and vector fields
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of Einstein's field equations in general relativity
  • Basic concepts of special relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Maxwell's equations and their implications for electromagnetic fields
  • Explore Einstein's field equations and their role in gravitational theory
  • Investigate the concept of gravitomagnetism and its effects
  • Learn about the differences between vector fields and tensor fields in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental differences between electromagnetic and gravitational fields.

birulami
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
A scalar potential ##\phi: \mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}## has the physical unit of energy per particle property, which can be charge or mass. Take the positional derivative and multiply by the particle property to get the force on the particle. So far gravitational and electric potential are the same.

Now, when the source of the potential, an electron on the one hand or just some mass on the other, is accelerated, the effects are quite different. For the electomagnetic case, the magnetic field, seemingly, pops out of nowhere. We suddenly have two interacting force fields, the electric and the magnetic.

There seems to be nothing equivalent for the gravitational field.

Can someone explain where the crucial difference is between the two potentials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
birulami said:
For the electomagnetic case, the magnetic field, seemingly, pops out of nowhere. We suddenly have two interacting force fields, the electric and the magnetic.

There seems to be nothing equivalent for the gravitational field.
See the Wikipedia article on gravitomagnetism.
 
birulami said:
Now, when the source of the potential, an electron on the one hand or just some mass on the other, is accelerated, the effects are quite different. For the electomagnetic case, the magnetic field, seemingly, pops out of nowhere. We suddenly have two interacting force fields, the electric and the magnetic.

There seems to be nothing equivalent for the gravitational field.

Can someone explain where the crucial difference is between the two potentials?

There are analogous phenomena for gravity, as Bill_K's link discusses. You can think of magnetic and gravitomagnetic effects as being special relativistic effects (they are proportional to v/c, so are relatively weak except at velocities near c).

In general, theories of instantaneous action at a distance are incompatible with special relativity. Instead you need some sort of field to mediate forces. Maxwell's equations give a field theory for electromagnetism that is compatible with special relativity. The equivalent equations for gravity are the Einstein field equations of general relativity.

There is not a perfect analogy, though. In the jargon, the electromagnetic field is a "vector" field while in general relativity the gravitational field is a "tensor" field. Vector field theories and tensor field theories are two different possible ways to make field theories that are compatible with relativity. But at low velocities, both theories look the same, which is why both gravity and electromagnetism follow similar 1/r^2 laws.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K