Electrostatic and gravitational forces

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces that prevent an object from penetrating the ground, specifically focusing on the roles of electrostatic forces and gravitational forces, as well as the implications of quantum mechanics in understanding these interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that electrostatic forces between the particles of the object and the ground contribute to maintaining their integrity, while others emphasize the role of gravitational forces.
  • One participant highlights the importance of quantum mechanics and the Pauli exclusion principle in explaining the stability of bulk matter, suggesting that classical perspectives are insufficient.
  • There is a discussion about hypothetical particles that might interact gravitationally but not electromagnetically, which could pass through the Earth, raising questions about dark matter.
  • Several participants question whether there is any electrostatic interaction between a grounded, electrically neutral object and the ground, with some asserting that there must be such interactions to prevent the object from falling through the Earth.
  • Electromagnetic interactions are described as fundamental to the bulk properties of matter, influencing why solids maintain their form compared to gases or liquids.
  • One participant notes that classical theories cannot adequately explain the stability of matter, reinforcing the necessity of quantum theory in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the contributions of electrostatic and gravitational forces, as well as the role of quantum mechanics. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the primary factors involved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of particles and forces, and the implications of quantum mechanics are not fully explored. There are also unresolved questions about the specific interactions at play in the scenario described.

Ranku
Messages
434
Reaction score
18
An object on the surface of the ground does not penetrate the ground. How much is this because of the electrostatic force between the particles constituting the ground and the object, and thereby maintaining their integrity? And, how much is it because of the materiality of the mass of the particles constituting the ground and the object and the gravitational force between them?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
One important aspect to the answer of this question is quantum mechanics, and particularly also the Pauli exclusion principle. It's not possible to understand the existence of stable bulk matter from a classical microscopic point of view to begin with. It's not even possible to understand the existence of a stable hydrogen atom without quantum mechanics!
 
Ranku said:
An object on the surface of the ground does not penetrate the ground. How much is this because of the electrostatic force between the particles constituting the ground and the object, and thereby maintaining their integrity? And, how much is it because of the materiality of the mass of the particles constituting the ground and the object and the gravitational force between them?
If you imagine a particle that interacts with the Earth gravitationally but not otherwise (no electric charge for example), then that particle would pass right through the Earth.

There may be such particles that constitute the dark matter that makes up the missing mass of the galaxies. These particles would not clump together like ordinary matter into stars and planets but would ghost straight through stars and planets.
 
PeroK said:
If you imagine a particle that interacts with the Earth gravitationally but not otherwise (no electric charge for example), then that particle would pass right through the Earth.

There may be such particles that constitute the dark matter that makes up the missing mass of the galaxies. These particles would not clump together like ordinary matter into stars and planets but would ghost straight through stars and planets.
Just to clarify, given that the object is grounded and electrically neutral, is there any electrostatic interaction between the object and the ground?
 
Ranku said:
Just to clarify, given that the object is grounded and electrically neutral, is there any electrostatic interaction between the object and the ground?
There must be, otherwise the particle would fall through the centre of the Earth - and exhibit SHM.

For atoms, the force is the electrostatic repulsion of the electron shells, for example.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ranku
The mystery of contact forces: Electromagnetic interaction or Pauli Exclusion Principle?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Ranku said:
Just to clarify, given that the object is grounded and electrically neutral, is there any electrostatic interaction between the object and the ground?
Electromagnetic interactions are responsible for just about all of the bulk properties of any chunk of matter, including the object and the ground underneath it. These interactions are between the charged particles (electrons and atomic nuclei) that make up the matter and they are present even if the matter in bulk is electrically neutral (positive charges on nuclei balanced by equal number of negative charges from electrons).

These interactions are why the object is a solid instead of a gas or a liquid, why the ground is something we can stand on instead of a cloud of dust particles, and it is electrical forces between the particles in the ground and particles in the object that resist our efforts to push the object into the ground.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Ranku
All this however works only within quantum theory. Classically one cannot account for the stability of matter as we know it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
17K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K