- #1
Relative0
- 11
- 0
I am trying to understand Gaussian curvature. This led me into looking at principle curvature. Now If one takes a look at the picture of the "Saddle Surface" on Wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_curvature
I see that at the point p on the saddle where curvature goes both positive and negative in different directions that there is a normal vector at point p. There are two planes of "principle curvature" which intersect at the normal vector at p. But furthermore that each normal plane (containing the normal p) intersects the surface and that at the point p a tangent plane is made which intersects any particular normal plane through p. That also for each normal plane going through p, the intersection of the normal plane with the surface gives rise to a curve on the normal plane - each curve different depending on the normal plane chosen. Now According to Wikipedia:
"The directions of the normal plane where the curvature takes its maximum and minimum values are always perpendicular, if k1 does not equal k2"
This part I don't understand.. I see that this result is due to Euler, but don't see why (or where to find an explanation on as to why this is true.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Brian
I see that at the point p on the saddle where curvature goes both positive and negative in different directions that there is a normal vector at point p. There are two planes of "principle curvature" which intersect at the normal vector at p. But furthermore that each normal plane (containing the normal p) intersects the surface and that at the point p a tangent plane is made which intersects any particular normal plane through p. That also for each normal plane going through p, the intersection of the normal plane with the surface gives rise to a curve on the normal plane - each curve different depending on the normal plane chosen. Now According to Wikipedia:
"The directions of the normal plane where the curvature takes its maximum and minimum values are always perpendicular, if k1 does not equal k2"
This part I don't understand.. I see that this result is due to Euler, but don't see why (or where to find an explanation on as to why this is true.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Brian