MHB Probabilities of certain events in a lucky wheel game

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a wheel of fortune game with ten equal sectors, where candidates K1 and K2 spin the wheel to determine a winner based on the numbers spun. To ensure at least one draw with a probability of at least 0.95, a minimum of seven candidate pairs must participate. The probability of a draw in a single match is calculated as 0.38, leading to the conclusion that at least seven matches are needed to achieve the desired probability. Additionally, the probability that at most 143 out of 376 matches end in a draw raises questions about the application of the binomial theorem. The conversation highlights the mathematical approach to determining probabilities in this game scenario.
emmi2104
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Given information:
A wheel of fortune with ten equal sectors is used for a candidate game. Five of these sectors are labelled only with the number 1, three only with the number 2 and two only with the number 3.

The game for a pair of candidates is as follows: The two candidates �K1 and K2, independently of each other, each spin the wheel of fortune once. The winner is the candidate who has "spun" the higher number. If the numbers are the same, the game ends in a draw.

  • f) The game described above is played with 𝑛 pairs of candidates. What is the minimum number of candidate pairs with which the game must be played so that with a probability of at least 0.95 at least one game ends in a draw?
and
  • h) With what probability 𝑝 do at most 143 of the 376 matches end in a draw?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I see this is an old unanswered question. Perhaps it was a homework problem at one time. I would start by finding out the probability of (not a tie) in a single match.
 
That would be 1 - (0.5^2+0.3^2+0.2^2) = 0.62
Now what's the minimum value of n s.t. 0.62^n <= 0.05? Trial and error (or taking the log of .05 base 0.62 and rounding up) says 7

Does h require the binomial theorem?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top