Probability and Energy of a Particle in Coherent State

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle in a harmonic potential, specifically analyzing its energy in a coherent state at time t=0. The original poster presents a series of questions regarding the expected value of energy, its uncertainty, and the probability of measuring energy below a certain threshold at different times.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the expected value of energy and its uncertainty, with some attempting calculations based on the Hamiltonian. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of annihilation and creation operators, and how to determine probabilities associated with energy measurements. There is also discussion about the representation of states in terms of energy eigenstates and the extraction of coefficients from a superposition.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and calculations related to the expected value of energy and its uncertainty. Some guidance is offered regarding the extraction of coefficients from the state representation, but no consensus has been reached on the probability calculations or the implications of the coherent state representation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem, particularly in relation to the coherent state and the need for specific forms of representation to derive probabilities. There is an acknowledgment of the potential for multiple interpretations of the measurements and calculations involved.

skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


A particle in harmonic potential $$H=\hbar \omega (a^\dagger a+1/2)$$ is at ##t=0## in coherent state $$a|\psi>=2|\psi>$$ a) Calculate expected value of energy and it's uncertainty at ##t=0##
b) With what probability do we at ##t=0## measure the energy less than ##3\hbar \omega##?
c) And what if we measure it at ##t=\frac \pi \omega##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have to apologize, but I only have an idea on have to try with the a) part, while I haven't got a clue on b) and c).
a)$$<H>=<\psi |H|\psi>=\hbar \omega( <\psi|\psi>+<\psi|a^\dagger a|\psi>$$ I hope I can say that ##<\psi|a^\dagger a|\psi>=2<\psi|a^\dagger |\psi>=2<a\psi|\psi>=4<\psi|\psi>=4##

Than ##<H>=\frac 9 2 \hbar \omega##. $$<H^2>=(\hbar \omega)^2(<\psi|(a^\dagger a)(a^\dagger a)|\psi>+<\psi|a^\dagger a|\psi>+\frac 1 4)$$
Now I am not sure what to do with ##<\psi|(a^\dagger a)(a^\dagger a)|\psi>##... :/

b) and c).. I would be really happy to get a hint here :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) What kind of relations do you know that let's all of the annihilation operators act to the right and all the creation operators to act to the left?

(b) What states have energy less than this? What is the probability of being in one of these states?

(c) Same as (b) with the additional question: How does the state evolve with time?
 
a) I didn't quite understand your question, but I did manage to get a solution, hopefully without mistakes: $$<H>=\frac 9 2 \hbar \omega $$ and $$<H^2>=<\psi|(a^\dagger a+1/2)^2|\psi>=(\hbar \omega)^2(<\psi|a^\dagger (aa^\dagger) a|\psi>+<\psi |a^\dagger a|\psi>+\frac 1 4<\psi|\psi>)$$ It is useful to realize that ##[a,a^\dagger]=1## because this tells me that ##aa^\dagger =1+a^\dagger a##. Using this gives me
##<\psi |a ^ \dagger (aa ^ \dagger ) a | \psi>## ##=<\psi |a ^ \dagger a| \psi >+## ##<\psi |a ^ {\dagger 2} a^2| \psi >=##
##=2<\psi | a ^ \dagger \psi >+## ##4<\psi |a ^{\dagger 2}| \psi >## ##=2<a \psi | \psi >+## ##4<a ^ {\dagger 2} \psi | \psi >## ##=4+16##
And the second and third term in Hamiltonian together are $$<\psi |a^\dagger a|\psi>+\frac 1 4<\psi|\psi>=4+\frac 1 4 $$ Therefore $$<H^2>=(\hbar \omega) ^2 \frac{97}{4}$$.

Would this be ok?

b) Yes I thought about this. Generally speaking, what Hamiltonian does is $$H|\psi>=\hbar \omega(n+1/2)|\psi>$$ which leaves me with 3 possible states ##n\in {0,1,2}## if ##E\leq 3\hbar \omega##. BUT probability of being in any of those states is what I am having troubles with, because If I am not mistaken all states are possible.
 
Last edited:
skrat said:
It is useful to realize that [a,a†]=1[a,a^\dagger]=1 because this tells me that aa†=1+aaaa^\dagger =1+a^\dagger a.


Yes, this is what I was referring to.

(b) What you write is true for the energy eigenstates, not for the general state ##|\psi\rangle##. What is the probability of being in any eigenstate if you know the wave function of the current state and the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian?
 
b) Hmmm... Well, a general state ##|\psi>## could be (or is?) a superposition of eigenstates ##|\psi>=\sum _n C_n|n>##, if so, than ##|C_n|^2## is the probability to be in ##n## eigenstate.
And I am assuming this is not what you wanted to hear, because this doesn't help at all. :D
 
It is, the question is how you are going to extract the ##C_n## coefficients.
 
And how can I do that?
 
If you had a vector you can write it as a linear combination of the basis vectors, how would you extract the ith component of the vector? (I.e., the coefficient of the ith basis vector)
 
Multiply everything with the ith basis vector.
 
  • #10
Exactly. Therefore ...
 
  • #11
##|\psi>=\sum _n C_n|n> \Rightarrow <n|\psi>=C_n##

But I would need some numbers, right? Why do I have a feeling that this is supposed to be really simple and I just can't see it?
 
  • #12
How do you express the inner product between two states in position basis?
 
  • #13
##<n|m>=\int \psi_n\psi_m^*=\delta _{n,m}##

Position basis? I think I have never done that. Does this add ##cos(\vartheta )## in the equation above?
 
  • #14
You probably have but you might not have called it that, it is the most common basis where you represent the states by their wave functions.
 
  • #15
Ok maybe, just maybe I got it now.

We can expand coherent states in Fock space $$|z>=e^{-\frac 1 2 |z|^2}\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{z^n}{\sqrt{n!}}|n>$$ which in my case for ##n\in
\begin{Bmatrix}
0,1,2
\end{Bmatrix}## means $$e^{-2}|0>+2e^{-2}|1>+\frac{4}{\sqrt 2}e^{-2}|2>$$ This than gives me the desired coefficients and possible energies.
 
  • #16
Correct, but note that if you are not given this form of a coherent state, you must first show that you can write the expansion on this form.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: skrat
  • #17
THANK YOU! (also for some other problems I had)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
95
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K