Probability distribution of outgoing energy of particle

dark_matter_is_neat
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Consider the scattering of particle 1 that is massless with particle 2 of mass m that is at rest in the lab frame. Let E and E' be the incoming and outgoing energy of particle 1 in the lab frame. Find the probability distribution of E' assuming that in the center of mass frame particle 1 is scatter in all directions with equal probability.
Relevant Equations
##p_{1} + p_{2} = p_{1}' + p_{2}'##
##v_{CM} = \frac{p_{total}}{E_{total}}##
So from particle 1 scattering in all directions with equal probability in the CM frame, I believe that that means probability of finding particle 1 in an angular range ##d\theta## is just ##\frac{d \theta}{2 \pi}##. Let P(E') be the probability density of E', so from the probability of finding the particle in a range ##d \theta##, ##P(E')dE' = \frac{d \theta}{2 \pi} ##, so ##P(E') = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \frac{d \theta}{dE'}##. Since this expression is in terms of the angle in the CM frame and not the lab frame, I need to solve for E' in terms of the angle in CM frame.

In the CM frame ##E'_{CM} = \frac{s - m^{2}}{2 \sqrt{s}}## where s is just the Mandelstam variable ##s = (p_{1} + p_{2})^{2}##. Since the square of a 4-vector is Lorentz invariant, ##(p_{1}+p_{2})^{2} = p_{1}^{2} + p_{2}^{2} + 2 p_{1} p_{2} = m^{2} + 2mE## (note I'm using natural units). So ##E'_{CM} = \frac{mE}{\sqrt{m^{2} + 2mE}}##. Now I need to relate this expression to E' in the lab frame, so I'll use a Lorentz transform for ##v_{CM} = \frac{p_{1}}{E + m} = \frac{E}{E+m}## and take the direction that particle 1 is initially moving in to be along the z axis for simplicity, so ##E' = \gamma E'_{CM} + \alpha E'_{CM}cos(\theta)## where ##\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - (v_{CM)^{2}}}## and ##\alpha = v_{CM} \gamma## when using natural units.
So rearranging this ## \theta = cos^{-1}(\frac{E' - \gamma E'_{CM}}{\alpha E'_{CM}})##, so plugging this back into my earlier expression for ##P(E')##,
I get ##P(E') = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \frac{1}{1 - (\frac{E' - \gamma E'_{CM}}{\alpha E'_{CM}})^{2} }##.

Is the right way to go about this problem or is something wrong with my thinking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So since it looks like I made a formatting error and for some reason I can't edit my post anymore, here is the section with messed up formatting fixed:
##\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v_{CM}^{2}}}## and ##\alpha = v_{CM} \gamma## when using natural units. So So rearranging the expression for E' ##\theta = cos^{-1}(\frac{E' - \gamma E'_{CM}}{\alpha E'_{CM}})## So plugging this into my expression for P(E'), I get ##P(E') = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \frac{1}{1 - (\frac{E' - \gamma E'_{CM}}{\alpha E'_{CM}})^{2}}##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top