MHB Probability of Consecutive Data Points Rising and Falling in a Saw-tooth Pattern

InfoQualityDude
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What is the correct way to calculate the probability of a given number of consecutive data points forming a saw-tooth pattern?
The magnitudes of the rise or fall (the size of the moutain and valleys) are not material.
The only requirement is that each set of three consecutive data points must form either a mountain or a valley, and that there is 1 mountain, followed by 1 valley, followed by 1 mountain, followed by 1 valley, etc.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's suppose to have n random variable $\displaystyle x_{i}\ , i=1,2,...,n$ each of them uniformly distributed from 0 to 1. In this situation You have...

$\displaystyle P\{x_{i+1}<x_{i}\}=P\{x_{i+1}>x_{i}\}=\frac{1}{2}$ (1)

Let's set with $p_{n}$ the probability that the n $x_{i}$ form a 'saw tooth pattern'. It is quite obvious that $p_{2}=1$ so that , if the (1) is true, $p_{n}$ is the solution of the difference equation...

$\displaystyle p_{n+1}=\frac{p_{n}}{2}\ ,\ p_{2}=1$ (1)

... and that solution is $\displaystyle p_{n}=2^{2-n}$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top