MHB Probability of Drawing 3 Hearts and 3 Diamonds from a 52-Card Deck

Wilmer
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Code:
1:                                  1 (26/52)*
2:           11 (12/51)**                                     12 (13/51)***
3:  111            112                          121                        122
4:  1112     1121        1122           1211         1212            1221       1222
5:  11122    11212   11221  11222       12112    12121  12122    12211  12212   12221
6:  111222   112122  112212 112221      121122   121212 121221   122112 122121  122211
6 cards are drawn at random (no replacement) from a regular 52 cards deck.

What is probability that 3 will be hearts and 3 will be diamonds?

1 = hearts : 2 = diamonds
* 26/52 chance to draw 1 or 2 at 1st draw: make it a 1.
** 12/51 chance that 2nd card is a 1
*** 13/51 chance that 2nd card is a 2
...and so on

Is that the proper way to "attack" this?

My 1st time dealing with "probability trees"; doesn't seem like much fun!

I got probability of 1/250 by simulation...trying to confirm it...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not completely confident in this approach but I believe the answer can be found simply by:

[math]\frac{ \binom{13}{3} \binom{13}{3}}{\binom{52}{6}}[/math]

This gives a different answer than you found but this is normally how I approach card problems with no replacement.
 
Thanks; that computes to .00401777732...
Which is slightly above what I got: 1/250 = .004
So at least my simulation is confirmed (Nod)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top