MHB Probability of Missed Bullseye 3+ Times in 4 Shots

AI Thread Summary
Mary's probability of visiting a friend who is home is 16%, calculated from her visiting Ann 40% of the time with a 10% chance Ann is home, and visiting Sarah 60% of the time with a 20% chance Sarah is home. For the darts player, who hits the bullseye 80% of the time, the probability of missing the bullseye at least 3 times in 4 shots is 17/625. This includes the probabilities of missing all 4 shots and missing 3 out of 4 shots in various combinations. The calculations demonstrate the application of probability theory in real-life scenarios. Understanding these probabilities can aid in decision-making and risk assessment.
SteffiB
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1.Mary has two friends, Ann and Sarah. Mary will visit Ann this evening if the 19A bus arrives before 6PM. Otherwise, She will visit Sarah. The probability of the 19A bus arriving before 6pm is 40%. If she visits Ann, the probability that Ann will be at home is 10% and if she visits Sarah, the probability that Sarah will be home is 20%. Find the probability that the friend Mary visits will be home

2.A darts player finds that on average he hits the bullseye 4 times out of 5. Calculate the probability that in a random sample of 4 shots, he will miss the bullseye at least 3 times
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
SteffiB said:
1.Mary has two friends, Ann and Sarah. Mary will visit Ann this evening if the 19A bus arrives before 6PM. Otherwise, She will visit Sarah. The probability of the 19A bus arriving before 6pm is 40%. If she visits Ann, the probability that Ann will be at home is 10% and if she visits Sarah, the probability that Sarah will be home is 20%. Find the probability that the friend Mary visits will be home
Imagine this happenng 1000 times. 40% of the time, 400 times, she visits Ann. 10% of those, 40 times, Ann is home. 100- 40= 60% of the time, 600 times, she visits Sarah. 20% of those, 120 times, Sarah is home. So of the 1000 times, the person she visits is home 40+ 120= 160 times. The probably the person she visits will be home is 160/1000= 16%.

2.A darts player finds that on average he hits the bullseye 4 times out of 5. Calculate the probability that in a random sample of 4 shots, he will miss the bullseye at least 3 times
Since, on average, he hits the bullseye "4 times out of 5" the probability he will hit the bullseye on anyone shot is 4/5 and the probability he misses is 1- 4/5= 1/5. "At least 3 times" in 4 shots is either "all 4 shots" or "3 out 4 shots". The probability of missing "all 4 shots" is (1/5)(1/5)(1/5)(1/5)= 1/5^4= 1/625. One way of missing "3 out of 4 shots" is to miss the first three shots and hit the last one. The probability of that is (1/5)(1/5)(1/5)(4/5)= 4/5^4= 4/635. But you could also miss the first two, hit the third and then miss the fourth. That is also (1/5)(1/5)(4/5)(1/5) which is also 4/625. There are also "Hit, Miss, Hit, Hit" and "Miss, Hit, Hit, Hit". There are four such orders and tne probability of each is 4/625. That means that the probability of "three misses and one hit", in any order, is 4(4/625)= 16/625.

The probability of "at least three misses" is the sum, 1/625+ 16/625= 17/625.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top