Probability of seeing peak noise in a given time window

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of observing peak noise in an electric signal with a specified RMS noise value over a defined time window. Participants explore various models and assumptions related to noise characteristics and measurement bandwidth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the peak noise can be calculated by multiplying the RMS value by 6.6, leading to a peak noise of 66uV, and seeks a probability equation for observing this peak within a 20us time window.
  • Another participant notes that the probability may depend on the bandwidth of the measurement apparatus, proposing that with a 1MHz bandwidth, there would be 20 independent samples in 20us, and questions the probability of a single sample exceeding 6.6 σ under a Gaussian distribution.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that the model for the noise source is crucial, stating that if the noise is memoryless, there would be an infinite number of independent samples, ensuring a peak signal is observed. However, they caution that real noise sources have duration and may not behave as memoryless processes.
  • One participant proposes a model involving independent noise sources with Poisson distribution characteristics, suggesting that this could lead to a differential equation and a recurrence relation for calculating probabilities.
  • Another participant shares their attempt at modeling the situation mathematically, presenting a set of equations that describe the probability of current noise sources over time, and notes the complexity of the solution involving double exponential integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of noise and its modeling, with no consensus on the best approach to calculate the probability of observing peak noise. Multiple competing models and assumptions are presented, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about noise characteristics, such as memorylessness and independence, which may not hold in practical scenarios. The mathematical models proposed involve complex relationships that are not fully resolved within the thread.

jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
Hi!

Say I have a electric signal that has an RMS noise value of 10uV, I would calculate peak noise by multiplying by 6.6, so 66uV. I am looking for an equation that describes the probability of seeing a noise voltage that reaches 66uV in a given viewing time window. For example if I look at the voltage signal for 20us, what is the probability of seeing 66uV?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it depends upon the "bandwidth" of your measurement apparatus. For instance if the bandwidth is 1MHz then you are effectively taking 20 independent "samples" in 20 us. What is the probability that a single sample exceeds 6.6 σ for a (presumably) Gaussian distribution?

Consider this is from a non statistician, so corrections are invited!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
It depends on your model for the source of the noise.

If it is completely memoryless, the noise at an instant being independent of all preceding levels, then you have an infinity of independent samples in any interval. You are guaranteed to get maximum signal in there somewhere.

In practice, noise is not like that. Any actual source of noise will have some duration. Your model could have a number, possibly infinite, of independent noise sources, each with a Poisson distribution of occurrence and some distribution of duration and amplitude (and randomly +/-). These parameters would rapidly tail off down the sequence so that the sum of the noise stays reasonable.

But do you really care about the peak across a continuous interval, or as @hutchphd suggests, only at certain instantaneous samples in the interval?

Edit:
I've thought of a model that might be tractable.
An infinite population of sources independently, with probability that one will start of ##\lambda\delta t## in each period ##\delta t##. Of those currently active, each stops with probability ##\mu\delta t## in each period ##\delta t##.
That yields a differential equation in the form of a recurrence relation. Using a generating function turns it into a PDE in two independent variables.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and DaveE
Here's my attempt using the model I outlined:
Let ##P_n(t)## be the probability of n current sources at time t. For n>0:
##P_n(t+\delta t)=P_n(t)(1-\lambda\delta t-n\mu\delta t)+P_{n-1}(t)\lambda\delta t+P_{n+1}(t)(n+1)\mu\delta t##
and
##P_0(t+\delta t)=P_0(t)(1-\lambda\delta t)+P_{1}(t)\mu\delta t##.
Whence for n>0, in steady state:
##\dot P_n=-(\lambda+n\mu)P_n+\lambda P_{n-1}+(n+1)\mu P_{n+1}##
and
##\dot P_0=-\lambda P_0+\mu P_1##.
Using the generating function ##G(s)=\Sigma_{s=0}^\infty s^nP_n##, I get
##(1-s)G'=\sigma(1-s)G-\sigma P_0+P_1##, where ##\sigma=\lambda/\mu##.
Unfortunately, the solution appears to involve integrating a double exponential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K