Probability of seeing peak noise in a given time window

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the probability of observing peak noise in an electric signal with an RMS noise value of 10uV, leading to a peak noise calculation of 66uV using a multiplier of 6.6. The conversation highlights the importance of measurement bandwidth, with a 1MHz bandwidth allowing for 20 independent samples in a 20 microsecond observation window. The participants explore various noise models, including Gaussian distributions and Poisson processes, to derive a probability equation for peak noise occurrences, ultimately leading to a differential equation that describes the system's behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RMS noise and peak noise calculations
  • Familiarity with Gaussian and Poisson distributions
  • Knowledge of differential equations and recurrence relations
  • Experience with generating functions in probability theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the impact of measurement bandwidth on noise sampling
  • Learn about Gaussian distribution properties in signal processing
  • Explore Poisson processes and their applications in noise modeling
  • Investigate the use of generating functions for solving differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, signal processing specialists, and statisticians interested in noise analysis and probability modeling in electronic signals.

jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
Hi!

Say I have a electric signal that has an RMS noise value of 10uV, I would calculate peak noise by multiplying by 6.6, so 66uV. I am looking for an equation that describes the probability of seeing a noise voltage that reaches 66uV in a given viewing time window. For example if I look at the voltage signal for 20us, what is the probability of seeing 66uV?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it depends upon the "bandwidth" of your measurement apparatus. For instance if the bandwidth is 1MHz then you are effectively taking 20 independent "samples" in 20 us. What is the probability that a single sample exceeds 6.6 σ for a (presumably) Gaussian distribution?

Consider this is from a non statistician, so corrections are invited!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
It depends on your model for the source of the noise.

If it is completely memoryless, the noise at an instant being independent of all preceding levels, then you have an infinity of independent samples in any interval. You are guaranteed to get maximum signal in there somewhere.

In practice, noise is not like that. Any actual source of noise will have some duration. Your model could have a number, possibly infinite, of independent noise sources, each with a Poisson distribution of occurrence and some distribution of duration and amplitude (and randomly +/-). These parameters would rapidly tail off down the sequence so that the sum of the noise stays reasonable.

But do you really care about the peak across a continuous interval, or as @hutchphd suggests, only at certain instantaneous samples in the interval?

Edit:
I've thought of a model that might be tractable.
An infinite population of sources independently, with probability that one will start of ##\lambda\delta t## in each period ##\delta t##. Of those currently active, each stops with probability ##\mu\delta t## in each period ##\delta t##.
That yields a differential equation in the form of a recurrence relation. Using a generating function turns it into a PDE in two independent variables.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and DaveE
Here's my attempt using the model I outlined:
Let ##P_n(t)## be the probability of n current sources at time t. For n>0:
##P_n(t+\delta t)=P_n(t)(1-\lambda\delta t-n\mu\delta t)+P_{n-1}(t)\lambda\delta t+P_{n+1}(t)(n+1)\mu\delta t##
and
##P_0(t+\delta t)=P_0(t)(1-\lambda\delta t)+P_{1}(t)\mu\delta t##.
Whence for n>0, in steady state:
##\dot P_n=-(\lambda+n\mu)P_n+\lambda P_{n-1}+(n+1)\mu P_{n+1}##
and
##\dot P_0=-\lambda P_0+\mu P_1##.
Using the generating function ##G(s)=\Sigma_{s=0}^\infty s^nP_n##, I get
##(1-s)G'=\sigma(1-s)G-\sigma P_0+P_1##, where ##\sigma=\lambda/\mu##.
Unfortunately, the solution appears to involve integrating a double exponential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K