Probability proof by combinatorial argument

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
Proggy99
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


By a combinatorial argument, prove that for r [tex]\leq[/tex] n and r [tex]\leq[/tex] m,
[tex](^{n+m}_{r})[/tex] = [tex](^{m}_{0})(^{n}_{r})[/tex] + [tex](^{m}_{1})(^{n}_{r-1})[/tex] + ... + [tex](^{m}_{r})(^{n}_{0})[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I need some direction on how to start this problem. It is the only homework problem I am not sure of how to approach it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
okay, so here is my attempt at beginning the solution

The left side gives the number of ways that you can pick r total items from a set made up of two subsets of items with m and n items in each subset.

The right side gives a series of permutations including how to pick no items from the first subset and all r items from the second, then how to pick 1 item from the first subset and the rest from the second, then 2 items from the first subset and the rest from the second, and continuing on until you are choosing all r items from the first subset and no items from the second.

I am just not sure how to go about putting this in proof form
 
So a choice on the right side must correspond to one of the choices on the left side and vice versa, right? I think that's exactly what you want to say, and I would call it a 'proof'.
 
You can argue that in order to pick r items from m + n items, you have to pick x from the m items and r - x from the n items.