Problem about a block of ice melting (specific latent heat)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy transfer between melting ice and surrounding water, emphasizing that the energy lost by the water equals the energy gained by the ice. The equations presented illustrate this balance, but the lack of specific temperature data complicates the calculations. It is assumed that thermal equilibrium is reached at 0 degrees Celsius, as both ice and water must coexist at this temperature to prevent further melting. This assumption is crucial for solving for the latent heat of fusion, as it provides the necessary conditions for the experiment. Understanding this equilibrium is essential for accurate calculations in thermodynamic scenarios involving phase changes.
RateOfReturn
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
A mass of 160 g of water at 100 °C is poured into the hollow. The water has specific
heat capacity 4.20 kJ kg-1 K-1. Some of the ice melts and the final mass of water in the
hollow is 365 g.
(i) Assuming no heat gain from the atmosphere, calculate a value, in kJ kg-1, for the
specific latent heat of fusion of ice. [3]
Relevant Equations
E= mcΔt
E=ml
1683999244901.png


Energy lost by water = Energy gained by ice

Energy lost by water = 0.16 x 4200 x (100-t)
Energy gained by ice = 0.205 x L + 0.205 x (t) (where t is the temperature at thermal equilibrium). However, there does not appear to be enough info to continue.

The solution, however, considered t to be 0- whilst not explicitly mentioned in the questions is this because the water remaining in the hollow and to prevent further ice melting we can assume they must have the same temperature ?
1683999591377.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RateOfReturn said:
The solution, however, considered t to be 0- whilst not explicitly mentioned in the questions is this because the water remaining in the hollow and to prevent further ice melting we can assume they must have the same temperature ?
Yes. We are to assume that the experimenter waited until an equilibrium was reached. An equilibrium with water and ice coexisting would naturally be at 0 degrees C.

The experimenter would be wise to do this because, as you noted, he otherwise would lack the ability to solve for the latent heat of fusion with the information that was collected.
 
  • Like
Likes RateOfReturn
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top