Problem about a block of ice melting (specific latent heat)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy transfer between melting ice and surrounding water, emphasizing that the energy lost by the water equals the energy gained by the ice. The equations presented illustrate this balance, but the lack of specific temperature data complicates the calculations. It is assumed that thermal equilibrium is reached at 0 degrees Celsius, as both ice and water must coexist at this temperature to prevent further melting. This assumption is crucial for solving for the latent heat of fusion, as it provides the necessary conditions for the experiment. Understanding this equilibrium is essential for accurate calculations in thermodynamic scenarios involving phase changes.
RateOfReturn
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
A mass of 160 g of water at 100 °C is poured into the hollow. The water has specific
heat capacity 4.20 kJ kg-1 K-1. Some of the ice melts and the final mass of water in the
hollow is 365 g.
(i) Assuming no heat gain from the atmosphere, calculate a value, in kJ kg-1, for the
specific latent heat of fusion of ice. [3]
Relevant Equations
E= mcΔt
E=ml
1683999244901.png


Energy lost by water = Energy gained by ice

Energy lost by water = 0.16 x 4200 x (100-t)
Energy gained by ice = 0.205 x L + 0.205 x (t) (where t is the temperature at thermal equilibrium). However, there does not appear to be enough info to continue.

The solution, however, considered t to be 0- whilst not explicitly mentioned in the questions is this because the water remaining in the hollow and to prevent further ice melting we can assume they must have the same temperature ?
1683999591377.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RateOfReturn said:
The solution, however, considered t to be 0- whilst not explicitly mentioned in the questions is this because the water remaining in the hollow and to prevent further ice melting we can assume they must have the same temperature ?
Yes. We are to assume that the experimenter waited until an equilibrium was reached. An equilibrium with water and ice coexisting would naturally be at 0 degrees C.

The experimenter would be wise to do this because, as you noted, he otherwise would lack the ability to solve for the latent heat of fusion with the information that was collected.
 
  • Like
Likes RateOfReturn
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top