Problem about a block of ice melting (specific latent heat)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy transfer between melting ice and surrounding water, emphasizing that the energy lost by the water equals the energy gained by the ice. The equations presented illustrate this balance, but the lack of specific temperature data complicates the calculations. It is assumed that thermal equilibrium is reached at 0 degrees Celsius, as both ice and water must coexist at this temperature to prevent further melting. This assumption is crucial for solving for the latent heat of fusion, as it provides the necessary conditions for the experiment. Understanding this equilibrium is essential for accurate calculations in thermodynamic scenarios involving phase changes.
RateOfReturn
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
A mass of 160 g of water at 100 °C is poured into the hollow. The water has specific
heat capacity 4.20 kJ kg-1 K-1. Some of the ice melts and the final mass of water in the
hollow is 365 g.
(i) Assuming no heat gain from the atmosphere, calculate a value, in kJ kg-1, for the
specific latent heat of fusion of ice. [3]
Relevant Equations
E= mcΔt
E=ml
1683999244901.png


Energy lost by water = Energy gained by ice

Energy lost by water = 0.16 x 4200 x (100-t)
Energy gained by ice = 0.205 x L + 0.205 x (t) (where t is the temperature at thermal equilibrium). However, there does not appear to be enough info to continue.

The solution, however, considered t to be 0- whilst not explicitly mentioned in the questions is this because the water remaining in the hollow and to prevent further ice melting we can assume they must have the same temperature ?
1683999591377.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RateOfReturn said:
The solution, however, considered t to be 0- whilst not explicitly mentioned in the questions is this because the water remaining in the hollow and to prevent further ice melting we can assume they must have the same temperature ?
Yes. We are to assume that the experimenter waited until an equilibrium was reached. An equilibrium with water and ice coexisting would naturally be at 0 degrees C.

The experimenter would be wise to do this because, as you noted, he otherwise would lack the ability to solve for the latent heat of fusion with the information that was collected.
 
  • Like
Likes RateOfReturn
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top