Problem about electric potential

10 replies · 2K views · last reply
MatinSAR
Messages
676
Reaction score
207
Homework Statement
A spherical shell with radius R and surface charge density σ is located between two infinite plates with surface charge density σ and -σ . The electric potential at x=∞ is zero. find the electric potential at the center of the sphere and x=-∞
Relevant Equations
Electric potential equations.
V=kq/r
dV=kdq/r
Diagram of a circle of radius R between two parallel vertical lines, with the left line labelled -σ and the right line labelled σ; the circle is labelled σ at its top and radius R is marked by a dashed line from the centre to the right edge.

Can anyone help me how to solve this problem ?! I am sure that my answer is not right :

Handwritten working on lined paper computing electric potential: at center, V = V+σ + V−σ + Vσ = Vσ, so V = V due to spherical shell; V = k∫dq/r at r = R gives V = kQ/R = Q/(4πε0R); at r = −∞, V = V1 + V2 + V3 for +σ plate, −σ plate and spherical shell, with integrals of k Q dr/r and an integral from −R to −∞ crossed out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
I am not sure I understand your first equation $$V=V_{\sigma}+\cancel{V_{\sigma}}+\cancel{V_{-\sigma}}=V_{\sigma}.$$ Suppose that you removed the sphere and just had the two oppositely charged plates. Would you say that the potential between them is zero because $$V=\cancel{V_{\sigma}}+\cancel{V_{-\sigma}}=0~?$$If so how does a parallel plate capacitor get charged?

Also ##V=\frac{kQ}{r}## is the potential from a single point charge. Here you have a whole lot of charges distributed over three surfaces so this equation does not buy you much. I think it is safe to assume that the surfaces are not conducting and correctly superimpose potentials from two planes and a sphere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
MatinSAR said:
Homework Statement:: A spherical shell with radius R and surface charge density σ is located between two infinite plates with surface charge density σ and -σ . The electric potential at x=∞ is zero. find the electric potential at the center of the sphere and x=-∞

View attachment 300780
Care is needed wrt the infinities. Potentials in general have no fixed zero: you can define it to be zero at some point, and the potential at all other points is relative to that. Taking it to be zero at infinity is just a convention used in most electrostatics questions.
Here, note that it specifies it to be zero at x=∞ but implies it is not zero at x=-∞. How can this be? The key is the other infinity in the question: the extent of the plates.

Start by considering the field due just to the pair of plates. What is it between the plates? What is it outside them? What does that tell you about the p.d. they will create between x=-∞ and x=+∞?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
kuruman said:
I am not sure I understand your first equation
Thank you!
I don't know why some professors at university give students hardest questions to solve.
I couldn't even find similar question in Halliday/serway/university physics/… books …

Now I think electric potential due to spherical shell inside it is 0 because we don't have electric field inside it.
Is it right ?!

And I think electric potential due to those infinite planes is Ed. (E is electric field inside of plates and d is distance between plates.)
Is it right ?!

Handwritten derivation of the potential between two oppositely charged infinite plates with charge density sigma, a point P midway between them at distance d/2 from each, showing V+sigma - V0 = -sigma rho/(2 epsilon0) and the result V = Ed.

haruspex said:
Start by considering the field due just to the pair of plates. What is it between the plates? What is it outside them? What does that tell you about the p.d. they will create between x=-∞ and x=+∞?
Thank you …
Can I say p.d. is zero because there is no electric filed outside ?!
I mean p.d. between x=-∞ and x=+∞ is zero so at x=-∞ electric potential is 0 .
Is it right ?!
 
MatinSAR said:
Can I say p.d. is zero because there is no electric filed outside ?!
No. How does one find a potential difference given the electric fields?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
haruspex said:
No. How does one find a potential difference given the electric fields?
Textbook page showing equations 24-15 to 24-18 for work and potential difference, Figure 24-5 with electric field lines and equipotential surfaces for a dipole, and Figure 24-6 showing a test charge moving along a path in a nonuniform field.


I have said that base on this page of my book. Is it false ?!
E is 0 so DeltaV is 0.
 
MatinSAR said:
I have said that base on this page of my book. Is it false ?!
E is 0 so DeltaV is 0.
You have to do the integral all the way from x=-∞ to x=+∞. The field is not zero for some of that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
haruspex said:
You have to do the integral all the way from x=-∞ to x=+∞. The field is not zero for some of that.
So now I am 90% sure that electric potential at x=-∞ is -Ed. (E is electric field inside of plates and d is distance between plates.)

I'm sorry I said so much wrong.
 
Last edited:
MatinSAR said:
electric potential at x=-∞ is -Ed. (E is electric field inside of plates and d is distance between plates.)
Yes, that is how to find the potential at x=-∞ due to the charges on the plates. Now you have to add that due to the sphere. The same method can be used: integrate the field due to the sphere between x=-∞ and x=+∞ (which is trivial).
Then figure out the potential at x=0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
haruspex said:
Yes, that is how to find the potential at x=-∞ due to the charges on the plates. Now you have to add that due to the sphere. The same method can be used: integrate the field due to the sphere between x=-∞ and x=+∞ (which is trivial).
Then figure out the potential at x=0.
Well based on your tips final answer for electric potential at x=-∞ is - Ed ?! Am I right?!
Thank you so much for your help.
🙏🙏
 
MatinSAR said:
Well based on your tips final answer for electric potential at x=-∞ is - Ed ?! Am I right?!
Thank you so much for your help.
🙏🙏
Yes, but you need to express it in terms of the given variables ##R, \sigma##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR