Problem concerning permutation groups

  • Thread starter Thread starter wurth_skidder_23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Permutation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves permutation groups, specifically demonstrating that there is no permutation p such that p squared equals a given permutation u. The original poster attempts various substitutions for the elements of p to show this, but encounters difficulties in finding a valid configuration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different values for the elements of permutation p, questioning the validity of their choices and the implications of those choices on the overall problem. There is a focus on the order of permutations and the necessity of explaining why certain configurations do not work.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing insights into the mathematical properties of permutations, such as the sign of permutations, which may lead to a more concise proof. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the challenge of proving the statement without resorting to brute force methods, indicating a preference for more elegant mathematical reasoning. There is also a reference to terminology differences, such as "sign" versus "signature," which may affect understanding.

wurth_skidder_23
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem concerning permutation groups:

u =
1 2 3 4
-------
3 4 2 1

Show that there is no p such that p^2 (the second permutation) = uI've tried just substituting values for p1, p2, p3 and p4 in:
1 2 3 4
------------
p1 p2 p3 p4

p1 = 1 doesn't work because 1 would never go to 3 the second time

p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 4, p4 = 2, which doesn't work because 4 doesn't go to 1 the second time, it goes to 3.

p1 = 3 doesn't work because then p3 would also have to be 3, so 3 wouldn't go to 2 the second time

p1 = 4, p2 = 1, p3 = 1, p4 = 3, which doesn't work because 3 goes to 4 instead of the required 2.

Is this sufficient to show what's being asked?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the other permutations for p1=2,4?
 
I wrote those in the order I would do the second permutation. If it doesn't work in that order, it isn't going to work in any other order.
 
I'm saying, if you want that to count as a proof, you have to clearly explain why the other permutations won't work.
 
If p1 = 2, then p2 has to equal 3 for p1 to go to 3 the second time. That means p3 = 4 for 2 to go to 4 the second time. For those to hold true, p4 = 2 so 3 goes to 2, but then 4 goes to 2 which goes to 3, so it doesn't hold.

Similarly, if p1 = 4, then p4 = 3. 3 has to go to 1 for p4 to go to 1 on the second permutation, so p3 = 1. If p3 = 1, then p1 = 2 so 3 goes to 2 on the second permutation. Also, p2 = 1 because 1 goes to 4 and 2 has to go to 4 on the second permutation, but this means 3 goes to 1 which goes to 4, so 3 goes to 4 on the second permutation, which doesn't hold for u.
 
That works. Alternatively, do you know about the sign of permutations? This will give a one line proof.
 
I know about the sign, but I don't see where you're going. We call it the signature in our book. It would be great to know how to prove it without brute force. I'm an engineering major, so I'm not great at proofs.
 
Last edited:
Well if the sign of permutation p1 is e1 (which is either +/-1) and the sign of p2 is e2, then the sign of p1 p2 (ie, p1 followed by p2) is e1*e2. So what is the sign of p1^2?
 
It would have to be 1. I see now, thanks. I should've thought of that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 178 ·
6
Replies
178
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K